Jungle Jargon

This was the Socialism of the day back in the day. The more things change, the more they stay the same. The spirit is the same. Don’t be fooled.

Skip the Carousel

1 2

4 days ago | [YT] | 1

Jungle Jargon

Where am I?

2 weeks ago | [YT] | 0

Jungle Jargon

It’s taking a long time for people to identify the problem. The real problem is not necessarily Palestinians or Hezbollah or ISIS or Taliban or Hamas. These are merely surface problems. *The root problem and the common thread is the teaching of Islam* that is *the repeat offender* for hundreds of years. Know your history. Remember what happened in Yugoslavia and such places.

3 weeks ago | [YT] | 2

Jungle Jargon

Food for thought: *IF* the breakup of the continents happened *before* the global flood sediments were picked up and redeposited (including into the deep oceans) the breakup would have happened first and THEN the sediments from the global flood were redeposited everywhere, including the deep oceans. (This is an unlikely scenario.)

The reality of what happened is that the sediments from the global flood were picked up and redeposited everywhere FIRST and THEN the continents broke apart AFTER the global flood and the movement of the continents THEN caused the deep ocean floors to be subducted considering that all of the deep ocean floors are newly formed (the flood sediments are gone from the deep ocean floors). *A breakup before the earth was completely flooded cannot subduct the flood sediments as there is no longer a mechanism for that to happen.*

3 weeks ago | [YT] | 2

Jungle Jargon

The following points highlight a specific worldview that integrates the success of science and technology within a framework where a Creator is the ultimate source of reality. This viewpoint has indeed influenced many historical figures and modern individuals.

Here is a breakdown of how these ideas interact across history, philosophy, and science:
Historical Figures and the "Creation Mandate"
You are correct that many historically significant figures who were developers of science and technology operated from a worldview centered on a Creator.

Founders of Science: Figures like Isaac Newton, Robert Boyle, James Clerk Maxwell, and Johannes Kepler were deeply religious men who believed that studying the natural laws they discovered was a way of "thinking God's thoughts after Him" or fulfilling a "creation mandate" to steward the Earth.

The Rationale: They assumed the universe was created by a rational God, which made them believe the universe was orderly, consistent, and understandable through human reason and observation. They saw their work as confirming a created order, not as contradicting faith.
The Source and Flexibility of Physical Laws

Your assertion that "natural laws are not made by nature" is consistent with this historical and theological perspective:
Laws are Transcendent: In this view, the physical laws (like gravity or thermodynamics) are not inherent properties that nature created for itself. They are descriptions of the operating principles established by a transcendent Creator.

Nature is the Effect: "Nature is made to be what it is," an effect following a cause.

The Creator Can Supersede: The core theological premise is that the Creator is superior to the laws they established. This allows for the possibility of miracles or divine intervention, where the Creator temporarily "supersedes" the standard natural law without invalidating its normal operation.
Summary

The framework you are describing argues that all scientific accomplishment is ultimately predicated on the underlying reality of a created order established by a supernatural Creator. In this view: Natural Law describes the regular operation of God's creation.

Science is a tool to understand these laws.
The Creator is the ultimate source of everything and is not constrained by these laws.

This provides a coherent structure where science and a belief in a Creator are not contradictory but mutually informative.

4 weeks ago | [YT] | 1

Jungle Jargon

The Real Human Family. Noah (IJK, basal, no SNPs)
├── Shem (oldest son of Noah, basal M89-T, M9-C ancestral)
│ 1 ├── Arphaxad (IJ, M523-A to G, L15-G to A, oldest son of Shem)
│ │ ├── Dan (I1, M253-A to G) *Birger Jarl*
│ │ ├── Asher (I2, M438-G to A) *Cheddar Man*
│ │ ├── Levi & Arabic tribes (J1, M267-A to G) *CMH*
│ │ └── Judaic (J2, M172-A to G) *Kotias Klde Man*
│ 2 ├── Elam (H, M69-TC) *Elamo-Dravidians, Romani*
│ 3 ├── Asshur (G, M201-G to T) *Ötzi*
│ 4 ├── Aram (P14-C lineage)
│ 5 └── Lud (M213-G lineage)
├── Japheth (K, M9-C to G, L15-G to A, middle son of Noah)
│ 1 ├── Tubal (K/M/S, M230-G to A for S) *Neolithic Iberian*
│ 2 ├── Javan (T, M184-G to A) *Lübeck Man*
│ 3 ├── Tiras (L, M20-G to A) *Tepe Hissar Man*
│ 4 ├── Magog (NO, M231-G to A for N, M175-Present to Deleted for O) *Tianyuan Man*
│ 5 ├── Meshech (P, M45-G to A) *Geoksyur Man*
│ 6 ├── Madai (Q, M242-C to T) *Anzick-1*
│ 7 └── Gomer (R, M207-G to A)
│ ├── Ashkenaz (R1a, M198-A to G) *Nicholas Copernicus*
│ ├── Riphath (R1b, M269-G to A) *King Tut*
│ └── Togarmah (R2, M124-C to T) *Ganj Dareh Man*
└── Ham (M89-T to C, youngest son of Noah)
1 ├── Cush (B, M60-A to G, M168-C) *Mota Man*
│ └── Nimrod (C, M216-C to T, M168 C to T, P143-G to A) *Tianyuan Man*
2 ├── Phut (A, M42-A to T) *Ballito Bay Boy*
3 ├── Canaan (D, CTS3946-C to T)
│ └── Sin/Sinim (D1b, M64.1-G to A) *Sino-Tibetans, Jōmon, Ainu*
4 └── Mitzrayim (E, M96-G to C) *Old Kingdom individual, Ramesses III*

Virtually everyone present and accounted for.

2 months ago | [YT] | 2

Jungle Jargon

This is a little too coincidental, wouldn’t you say?

2 months ago | [YT] | 2

Jungle Jargon

The entire scientific community is oblivious to the fact that the limitation of the redshift looking into the black hole Sagittarius A said to be 26,000 light years away is the *exact SAME DISTANCE* as the limitation of the redshift looking at the most distant galaxies said to be 13 billion light years away. 👀😳🙄 It’s like they never even considered the effects of general relativity. 🦤 🦤 🦤

4 months ago | [YT] | 2

Jungle Jargon

Spacetime Without Mass: Refuting Standard Model Assumptions}
\author{Jungle Jargon}
\date{August 2025}
\maketitle

\begin{abstract}
The standard cosmological model relies on unverified assumptions, such as uniform flat spacetime and constant light-travel metrics, lacking empirical basis in regions with varying gravity. We propose that spacetime is defined by matter, mass, and gravity. In interstellar and intergalactic voids, where mass is negligible, time accelerates and distances expand, enabling light from Sagittarius A* and distant galaxies to reach Earth in under 6,000–7,000 years of proper time while maintaining \( c \). This suggests overestimated distances (e.g., ~26,000 light-years to Sagittarius A*) and a universe age far below the standard 13.8 billion years. These effects explain superluminal motions (up to 20c), spiral arm dynamics, and JWST redshift anomalies. Like Earth appearing flat locally but round globally, gravitational effects dominate on cosmic scales. Earth’s position near the Milky Way’s edge supports this model, challenging the standard model’s baseless assertions.
\end{abstract}

\section{Introduction}
The standard cosmological model assumes a uniform flat spacetime manifold and constant light-travel metrics, grounded in assertions like the cosmological principle and Hubble constant-based estimates, without empirical validation in regions of minimal mass. These assumptions lead to overestimated distances (e.g., ~26,000 light-years to Sagittarius A*) and an inflated universe age of 13.8 billion years. We propose that spacetime exists only with matter, mass, and gravity. In interstellar and intergalactic voids, time accelerates and distances expand, allowing light from local and distant sources to reach Earth in under 6,000–7,000 years of proper time, driven by differential causation rates (physical processes per unit time). Like Earth appearing flat locally but round globally, gravitational effects are profound on cosmic scales. Earth’s position near the Milky Way’s edge amplifies these effects, explaining superluminal motions (20c), spiral arm dynamics, JWST redshift anomalies, and a younger universe, refuting the standard model’s unfounded assumptions.

\section{Theoretical Framework}
\subsection{Challenging Standard Model Assumptions}
The standard model’s reliance on a uniform flat spacetime, even in mass-less voids, lacks evidence. The cosmological principle, asserting homogeneity and isotropy, and Hubble constant-based distance metrics assume constant spacetime properties without testing gravitational variations. These assertions ignore the dynamic interplay of mass and spacetime, leading to erroneous distance and age estimates.

\subsection{Void Spacetime}
In voids, with negligible mass, spacetime exhibits accelerated time (\( \tau_v \approx t \)) and expanded distances, with intergalactic voids showing greater effects (\( \kappa_g \gg \kappa_i \)) than interstellar voids. The line element is:
\begin{equation}
ds^2 = -c^2 dt^2 + dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2,
\end{equation}
but with extreme temporal acceleration and spatial expansion, rejecting flat spacetime assumptions.

\subsection{Galactic Spacetime}
Within the Milky Way, a radial gravitational gradient applies. Near the center, the Schwarzschild metric induces time dilation:
\begin{equation}
ds^2 = -\left(1 - \frac{2GM}{rc^2}\right)c^2 dt^2 + \left(1 - \frac{2GM}{rc^2}\right)^{-1} dr^2 + r^2 (d\theta^2 + \sin^2\theta d\phi^2).
\end{equation}
Outside the solar system (\( r > 1 \, \text{pc} \)), gravity decreases, approaching interstellar void conditions.

\subsection{Light Propagation Model}
For light from Sagittarius A* (\( D_s \approx 26,000 \, \text{light-years} \)) and a distant galaxy (\( D_g = 10^9 \, \text{light-years} \)), Earth’s position (\( r \approx 8.2 \, \text{kpc} \), \( \frac{2GM}{rc^2} \approx 10^{-6} \)) yields \( \tau \approx t \). Proper time is:
\begin{equation}
\tau = \int_0^D \sqrt{g_{00}(x)} \frac{dt}{c} \, dx.
\end{equation}
In voids, distances scale by \( \kappa \). For Sagittarius A*, with 50% interstellar void (\( f_i = 0.5 \), \( \kappa_i = 10^2 \)):
\begin{equation}
\tau_s \approx \frac{f_i D_s}{\kappa_i c} = \frac{0.5 \times 26,000}{10^2} = 130 \, \text{years}.
\end{equation}
For a galaxy, with 80% intergalactic void (\( f_g = 0.8 \), \( \kappa_g = 2 \times 10^5 \)):
\begin{equation}
\tau_g \approx \frac{f_g D_g}{\kappa_g c} = \frac{0.8 \times 10^9}{2 \times 10^5} = 4,000 \, \text{years}.
\end{equation}
Galactic segments add minor time dilation, keeping \( \tau_{\text{total}} < 7,000 \, \text{years} \).

\section{Cosmological Implications}
The standard model’s baseless assumptions inflate distances and light-travel times. JWST’s redshifted galaxies appear closer, with light arriving in <7,000 years via intergalactic voids. Interstellar voids overestimate the distance to Sagittarius A*. Superluminal motions (20c) and spiral arm dynamics reflect compounded void effects. The universe’s age, standardly 13.8 billion years, may be under 7,000 years.

\section{Conclusion}
Rejecting the standard model’s unverified assertions of uniform spacetime and constant metrics, we propose that voids, lacking mass, exhibit accelerated time and expanded distances, allowing light from Sagittarius A* and distant galaxies to reach Earth in under 6,000–7,000 years. These effects explain superluminal motions, spiral arm dynamics, and JWST anomalies. The Earth analogy—flat locally, round globally—highlights scale-dependent gravity. Earth’s position supports a universe age under 7,000 years, demanding a reevaluation of cosmological models.

\bibliography{references}
\end{document}

4 months ago | [YT] | 2

Jungle Jargon

I was thinking and I came across an interesting observation. I’ve said before that the distance to the most distant galaxies is closer than the distance to the center of our Sagittarius A. Then I was thinking, “Hey, wait a minute! The 26,000 light years to Sagittarius A is exactly the same distance as the 13 billion light year distance to the most distant galaxy!” (Both distances are at the very same redshift limit!) This is an extreme contradiction in cosmology!

4 months ago | [YT] | 3