The following points highlight a specific worldview that integrates the success of science and technology within a framework where a Creator is the ultimate source of reality. This viewpoint has indeed influenced many historical figures and modern individuals.
Here is a breakdown of how these ideas interact across history, philosophy, and science: Historical Figures and the "Creation Mandate" You are correct that many historically significant figures who were developers of science and technology operated from a worldview centered on a Creator.
Founders of Science: Figures like Isaac Newton, Robert Boyle, James Clerk Maxwell, and Johannes Kepler were deeply religious men who believed that studying the natural laws they discovered was a way of "thinking God's thoughts after Him" or fulfilling a "creation mandate" to steward the Earth.
The Rationale: They assumed the universe was created by a rational God, which made them believe the universe was orderly, consistent, and understandable through human reason and observation. They saw their work as confirming a created order, not as contradicting faith. The Source and Flexibility of Physical Laws
Your assertion that "natural laws are not made by nature" is consistent with this historical and theological perspective: Laws are Transcendent: In this view, the physical laws (like gravity or thermodynamics) are not inherent properties that nature created for itself. They are descriptions of the operating principles established by a transcendent Creator.
Nature is the Effect: "Nature is made to be what it is," an effect following a cause.
The Creator Can Supersede: The core theological premise is that the Creator is superior to the laws they established. This allows for the possibility of miracles or divine intervention, where the Creator temporarily "supersedes" the standard natural law without invalidating its normal operation. Summary
The framework you are describing argues that all scientific accomplishment is ultimately predicated on the underlying reality of a created order established by a supernatural Creator. In this view: Natural Law describes the regular operation of God's creation.
Science is a tool to understand these laws. The Creator is the ultimate source of everything and is not constrained by these laws.
This provides a coherent structure where science and a belief in a Creator are not contradictory but mutually informative.
Jungle Jargon
The following points highlight a specific worldview that integrates the success of science and technology within a framework where a Creator is the ultimate source of reality. This viewpoint has indeed influenced many historical figures and modern individuals.
Here is a breakdown of how these ideas interact across history, philosophy, and science:
Historical Figures and the "Creation Mandate"
You are correct that many historically significant figures who were developers of science and technology operated from a worldview centered on a Creator.
Founders of Science: Figures like Isaac Newton, Robert Boyle, James Clerk Maxwell, and Johannes Kepler were deeply religious men who believed that studying the natural laws they discovered was a way of "thinking God's thoughts after Him" or fulfilling a "creation mandate" to steward the Earth.
The Rationale: They assumed the universe was created by a rational God, which made them believe the universe was orderly, consistent, and understandable through human reason and observation. They saw their work as confirming a created order, not as contradicting faith.
The Source and Flexibility of Physical Laws
Your assertion that "natural laws are not made by nature" is consistent with this historical and theological perspective:
Laws are Transcendent: In this view, the physical laws (like gravity or thermodynamics) are not inherent properties that nature created for itself. They are descriptions of the operating principles established by a transcendent Creator.
Nature is the Effect: "Nature is made to be what it is," an effect following a cause.
The Creator Can Supersede: The core theological premise is that the Creator is superior to the laws they established. This allows for the possibility of miracles or divine intervention, where the Creator temporarily "supersedes" the standard natural law without invalidating its normal operation.
Summary
The framework you are describing argues that all scientific accomplishment is ultimately predicated on the underlying reality of a created order established by a supernatural Creator. In this view: Natural Law describes the regular operation of God's creation.
Science is a tool to understand these laws.
The Creator is the ultimate source of everything and is not constrained by these laws.
This provides a coherent structure where science and a belief in a Creator are not contradictory but mutually informative.
4 weeks ago | [YT] | 1