The egocentric nature of Uthman bin Farooq never ceases to amaze me. I’m not concerned with his slip of the tongue regarding Ibn Hajr being mentioned as the author of Al-Bidaayah wan-Nihaayah, nor the age of Khadijah رضي الله عنها.
What I want to focus on is the deeper issue his weak and lacking understanding of a particular science he claims to hold a Master’s degree in: Hadith. I will respond to his academic video where he attempts to present evidence to support his position academically to show just how weak his research actually is, casting further doubt on whether he truly has a Master’s in Hadith: youtu.be/yvJfOzQ9b_E?si…
Just as our brother Daniel Haqiqatjou has brothers or ghostwriters who support him with his research, so does Uthman bin Farooq @OneMessageFoundation
Wallahi, he is a Da’ee, and his rough and rugged style in debating Christians has indeed caught the attention of many believers, and I commend that. But as the saying goes: اعرف مكانك “Know your place.”
Strangely enough, I actually appreciate it when brothers corrects me. However, Uthman bin Farooq tends to label us as “haters” whenever critiqued
The ongoing saga of the self-proclaimed ‘Shaykh’ Uthman continues, marked by mistakes typically expected from laymen. Uthman needs to drop the act—teaching Aqeedah, Nahw, and Mustalah al-Hadith while struggling to read Arabic, all the while claiming to hold a “Master’s in Hadith” and peppering his speech with “Ya’ni” and “Tayyib” in every other sentence.
This video will dissect his poor level of knowledge and understanding, casting doubt on his claim of possessing a master’s degree in Hadith. @OneMessageFoundation
The surge in free-mixing among Muslims, due to liberal modernist imams, is a major problem. We have a duty to hold these imams accountable for the mess they have created for us in the West.
Are you serious with this response? 😂. Who said the above has to be connected to public funds managed by Baytul Maal under the Islamic State? I’m sorry, Abdullah, but it shows your understanding of Fiqh is lacking. This matter is connected with المعاملات المالية
Please review the below: قال ابن عابدين (المعاملات خمسة؛ المعاوضات المالية، والمناكحات، والمخاصمات، والأمانات، والتركات)
Hamza has to place a condition to send evidences?, Abdullah, I know you always have an answer for everything, but either your Arabic needs improving or you missed it.
مَنْ شَرَطَ عَلَى نَفْسِهِ طَائِعًا غَيْرَ مُكْرَهٍ فَهْوَ عَلَيْهِ Keyword: فَهْوَ عَلَيْهِ – this means he is bound by it, and cannot change it when he pleases.
When it comes to معاملات these don’t require the supervision of an Islamic state if we were living under it, how about for Muslim subjects living in a non-Muslim land
If you want to be consistent Muslim ibn Yasar said: كان أبو عبد الله رجل من الصحابة يقول: الزكاة والحدود والفيء والجمعة إلى السلطان
So, for your Zakat and Jumu’ah to be valid, do you also need a Sultan? Why would that requirement be different when it comes to ديون which comes after Zakat and Jumu’ah?
You are conflating matters that fall under ديانات not قضاة. I am not asking for his hand to be chopped off for theft 😂
It is permissible for me to warn others about your client. Please review Ibn Hajar al-Haytami’s comments on the permissibility of warning others:
تحذير المسلمين من الشر ونصيحتهم كجرح الرواة والشهود والمصنفين والمتصدين لإفتاء أو إقراء مع عدم أهلية، أو مع نحو فسق أو بدعة وهم دعاة إليها ولو سرا، فيجوز إجماعا بل يجب. وكأن يشير وإن لم يُستشر على مريد تزوج أو مخالطة لغيره في أمر ديني أو دنيوي، وقد علم في ذلك الغير قبيحا منفّرا كفسق أو بدعة أو طمع أو غير ذلك كفقر في الزوج….. الخامس: أن يتجاهر بفسقه أو بدعته كالمكاسين وشربة الخمر ظاهرا وذوي الولايات الباطلة، فيجوز ذكرهم بما تجاهروا به دون غيره، فيحرم ذكرهم بعيب آخر إلا أن يكون له سبب آخر مما مر
Ibn Hajr Al-Haythami in his book Az-Zawajir mentioned
شهادة الزور وقبولها كلاهما من الكبائر، وحكى بعضهم الإجماع على أن شهادة الزور كبيرة، ولا فرق بين أن يكون المشهود به قليلاً أو كثيرًا، فضلاً عن هذه المفسدة القبيحة الشنيعة جدًّا".
Both giving false evidence / testimony and accepting it are major sins. Some have reported an Ijmah that giving false testimony / evidence is a major sin, and there is no difference between the amount of evidence being given and the amount being given, let alone this extremely ugly and heinous corruption
قال البَغَويُّ: وَلَا تَكْتُمُوا الشَّهَادَةَ إذا دُعيتُم إلى إقامَتِها، نَهى عَن كِتمانِ الشَّهادةِ وأوعَدَ عليه
Imam Baghawi: And do not conceal evidence, if you are called upon to give it. He forbade concealing evidence and threatened punishment for it
وَمَن يَكْتُمْهَا فَإِنَّهُ آثِمٌ قَلْبُهُ، أي: فاجِرٌ قَلبُه، قال: فإنَّه آثِمٌ قَلبُه، وأرادَ به مَسخَ القَلبِ. نَعوذُ باللهِ من ذلك، وَاللَّهُ بِمَا تَعْمَلُونَ من بَيانِ الشَّهادةِ وكِتْمانِها عَلِيمٌ
Whoever conceals (evidence / testimony) it, surely his heart is sinful. Meaning - his heart is immoral / dissolute. It said: Surely, his heart is sinful. What is meant his heart is distorted and we seek refuge in Allah from that. Allah is aware of what you do from your evidence and concealing it
عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ أَبِي بَكْرَةَ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، قَالَ كُنَّا عِنْدَ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَقَالَ " أَلاَ أُنَبِّئُكُمْ بِأَكْبَرِ الْكَبَائِرِ - ثَلاَثًا - الإِشْرَاكُ بِاللَّهِ وَعُقُوقُ الْوَالِدَيْنِ وَشَهَادَةُ الزُّورِ أَوْ قَوْلُ الزُّورِ
Abu Bakra that his father said - We were in the company of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) that he observed: Should I not inform you about the most grievous of the grave sins He repeated it three times, and then said: Associating anyone with Allah, disobedience to parents, false testimony or false utterance. The Prophet was reclining, then he sat up, and he repeated it so many times that we wished that he should become silent
We know the famous hadith about the best generations. Many don’t know what the narrator added at the end
قَالَ سَمِعْتُ عِمْرَانَ بْنَ حُصَيْنٍ ـ رضى الله عنهما ـ قَالَ قَالَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم " خَيْرُكُمْ قَرْنِي، ثُمَّ الَّذِينَ يَلُونَهُمْ، ثُمَّ الَّذِينَ يَلُونَهُمْ ". قَالَ عِمْرَانُ لاَ أَدْرِي أَذَكَرَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم بَعْدُ قَرْنَيْنِ أَوْ ثَلاَثَةً. قَالَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم " إِنَّ بَعْدَكُمْ قَوْمًا يَخُونُونَ وَلاَ يُؤْتَمَنُونَ، وَيَشْهَدُونَ، وَلاَ يُسْتَشْهَدُونَ وَيَنْذِرُونَ وَلاَ يَفُونَ، وَيَظْهَرُ فِيهِمُ السِّمَنُ ".
I heard `Imran bin Husain saying, "The Prophet said, 'The best people are those living in my generation, then those coming after them, and then those coming after (the second generation)." `Imran said "I do not know whether the Prophet mentioned two or three generations after your present generation. The Prophet added, 'There will be some people after you, who will be dishonest and will not be trustworthy and will give witness (evidences) without being asked to give witness, and will vow but will not fulfill their vows, and obesity will appear among them
يَشهَدونَ ولا يُستَشهَدونَ)) فقال: (أحَدُها: أنَّه مَحمولٌ على شَهادةِ الزُّورِ
Ibn Hajr mentioned many possible explanations and one of them being giving false evidence / testimony
عبد الله بن مسعود رضي الله عنه قوله - صلّى الله عليه وسلم -: إن بين يدي السّاعة: ... شهادة الزور، وكتمان شهادة الحق
Abdullah bin Masood narration from Prophet who mentioned the signs of the hour and he included false evidence / testimony and concealing the truth
وظهورها دليلٌ على ضعف الإِيمان، وعدم الخوف من الرّحمن
Its emergence is evidence upon the weakness of faith, and the lack of fear of the Rahman
لو نَفَع العِلمُ بلا عمَل لَمَا ذَمَّ اللهُ سبحانه أَحبارَ أَهلِ الكِتاب، ولو نَفَع العَملُ بلا إخلاص لَمَا ذَمَّ المنافقين.
“If knowledge without action was of any benefit, Allah would not have criticised the Rabbis from the People of the Book, and if action without sincerity was of any benefit, He would not have criticised the hypocrites.”
The harsh truth is, in our day and age, we find many who don’t apply the knowledge they have gained. Rather, they use it for their own personal benefit and advancement. The religion has become a vehicle to fulfil their own purposes, objectives, and goals.
قال الخطيب البغدادي رحمه الله: كما لا تنفع الأموال إلا بإنفاقها، كذلك لا تنفع العلوم إلا لمن عَمِل بها.
Khateeb Al-Baghdadi said: “Just as money is of no benefit unless it is spent, likewise knowledge is of no benefit except for those who act upon it.”
قال مالك بن دينار: العبد إذا تعلم العلم لغير العمل زاده فخرًا.
Malik ibn Dinar said: “If a servant learns knowledge for other than action, it only increases him in pride.”
I will conclude by saying: we have too many wolves in sheep’s clothing.
The difference between military contractors (and the companies behind them) and Islamic charities is that military contractors provide services such as logistics, construction, and weapons manufacturing services that directly contribute to the genocide. In contrast, charities operate with humanitarian intentions, aiming to alleviate the suffering caused by the conflict.
Yet, despite their opposing roles, they share one critical commonality: both profit immensely from the genocide.
No aid has entered the Strip since 2nd March 2025.
Ramadan started in early March, and every charity, through their sponsored ads, claimed they were sending food packs into Gaza, knowing that no aid was entering. Yet, they continued collecting and receiving millions in donations. I would like to ask all these charities: what happened to your aid trucks or food packs?
May Allah curse anyone who is exploiting this genocide… آمين
Bro Hajji
Bro Hajji
The egocentric nature of Uthman bin Farooq never ceases to amaze me. I’m not concerned with his slip of the tongue regarding Ibn Hajr being mentioned as the author of Al-Bidaayah wan-Nihaayah, nor the age of Khadijah رضي الله عنها.
What I want to focus on is the deeper issue his weak and lacking understanding of a particular science he claims to hold a Master’s degree in: Hadith. I will respond to his academic video where he attempts to present evidence to support his position academically to show just how weak his research actually is, casting further doubt on whether he truly has a Master’s in Hadith:
youtu.be/yvJfOzQ9b_E?si…
Just as our brother Daniel Haqiqatjou has brothers or ghostwriters who support him with his research, so does Uthman bin Farooq @OneMessageFoundation
Wallahi, he is a Da’ee, and his rough and rugged style in debating Christians has indeed caught the attention of many believers, and I commend that. But as the saying goes: اعرف مكانك “Know your place.”
Strangely enough, I actually appreciate it when brothers corrects me. However, Uthman bin Farooq tends to label us as “haters” whenever critiqued
2 days ago (edited) | [YT] | 47
View 22 replies
Bro Hajji
The ongoing saga of the self-proclaimed ‘Shaykh’ Uthman continues, marked by mistakes typically expected from laymen. Uthman needs to drop the act—teaching Aqeedah, Nahw, and Mustalah al-Hadith while struggling to read Arabic, all the while claiming to hold a “Master’s in Hadith” and peppering his speech with “Ya’ni” and “Tayyib” in every other sentence.
This video will dissect his poor level of knowledge and understanding, casting doubt on his claim of possessing a master’s degree in Hadith. @OneMessageFoundation
#brohajji
#islam
#dawah
#ummah
#uthmanibnfarooq
3 days ago | [YT] | 39
View 9 replies
Bro Hajji
The surge in free-mixing among Muslims, due to liberal modernist imams, is a major problem. We have a duty to hold these imams accountable for the mess they have created for us in the West.
#brohajji
#islam
#muslim
5 days ago | [YT] | 25
View 1 reply
Bro Hajji
Are you serious with this response? 😂. Who said the above has to be connected to public funds managed by Baytul Maal under the Islamic State? I’m sorry, Abdullah, but it shows your understanding of Fiqh is lacking. This matter is connected with المعاملات المالية
Please review the below:
قال ابن عابدين
(المعاملات خمسة؛ المعاوضات المالية، والمناكحات، والمخاصمات، والأمانات، والتركات)
Hamza has to place a condition to send evidences?, Abdullah, I know you always have an answer for everything, but either your Arabic needs improving or you missed it.
مَنْ شَرَطَ عَلَى نَفْسِهِ طَائِعًا غَيْرَ مُكْرَهٍ فَهْوَ عَلَيْهِ
Keyword: فَهْوَ عَلَيْهِ – this means he is bound by it, and cannot change it when he pleases.
When it comes to معاملات these don’t require the supervision of an Islamic state if we were living under it, how about for Muslim subjects living in a non-Muslim land
If you want to be consistent Muslim ibn Yasar said: كان أبو عبد الله رجل من الصحابة يقول: الزكاة والحدود والفيء والجمعة إلى السلطان
So, for your Zakat and Jumu’ah to be valid, do you also need a Sultan? Why would that requirement be different when it comes to ديون which comes after Zakat and Jumu’ah?
You are conflating matters that fall under ديانات not قضاة. I am not asking for his hand to be chopped off for theft 😂
It is permissible for me to warn others about your client. Please review Ibn Hajar al-Haytami’s comments on the permissibility of warning others:
تحذير المسلمين من الشر ونصيحتهم كجرح الرواة والشهود والمصنفين والمتصدين لإفتاء أو إقراء مع عدم أهلية، أو مع نحو فسق أو بدعة وهم دعاة إليها ولو سرا، فيجوز إجماعا بل يجب. وكأن يشير وإن لم يُستشر على مريد تزوج أو مخالطة لغيره في أمر ديني أو دنيوي، وقد علم في ذلك الغير قبيحا منفّرا كفسق أو بدعة أو طمع أو غير ذلك كفقر في الزوج….. الخامس: أن يتجاهر بفسقه أو بدعته كالمكاسين وشربة الخمر ظاهرا وذوي الولايات الباطلة، فيجوز ذكرهم بما تجاهروا به دون غيره، فيحرم ذكرهم بعيب آخر إلا أن يكون له سبب آخر مما مر
You’re way out of your depth here – and I say that with the utmost respect. @AbdullahalAndalusi @HamzasDen
1 week ago (edited) | [YT] | 86
View 44 replies
Bro Hajji
شَهادةِ الزُّورِ
Allah says in the Qu’ran
وَلَا تَكْتُمُوا الشَّهَادَةَ
And conceal not the evidence/ testimony
Ibn Hajr Al-Haythami in his book Az-Zawajir mentioned
شهادة الزور وقبولها كلاهما من الكبائر، وحكى بعضهم الإجماع على أن شهادة الزور كبيرة، ولا فرق بين أن يكون المشهود به قليلاً أو كثيرًا، فضلاً عن هذه المفسدة القبيحة الشنيعة جدًّا".
Both giving false evidence / testimony and accepting it are major sins. Some have reported an Ijmah that giving false testimony / evidence is a major sin, and there is no difference between the amount of evidence being given and the amount being given, let alone this extremely ugly and heinous corruption
قال البَغَويُّ: وَلَا تَكْتُمُوا الشَّهَادَةَ إذا دُعيتُم إلى إقامَتِها، نَهى عَن كِتمانِ الشَّهادةِ وأوعَدَ عليه
Imam Baghawi: And do not conceal evidence, if you are called upon to give it. He forbade concealing evidence and threatened punishment for it
وَمَن يَكْتُمْهَا فَإِنَّهُ آثِمٌ قَلْبُهُ، أي: فاجِرٌ قَلبُه، قال: فإنَّه آثِمٌ قَلبُه، وأرادَ به مَسخَ القَلبِ. نَعوذُ باللهِ من ذلك، وَاللَّهُ بِمَا تَعْمَلُونَ من بَيانِ الشَّهادةِ وكِتْمانِها عَلِيمٌ
Whoever conceals (evidence / testimony) it, surely his heart is sinful. Meaning - his heart is immoral / dissolute. It said: Surely, his heart is sinful. What is meant his heart is distorted and we seek refuge in Allah from that. Allah is aware of what you do from your evidence and concealing it
عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ أَبِي بَكْرَةَ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، قَالَ كُنَّا عِنْدَ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَقَالَ " أَلاَ أُنَبِّئُكُمْ بِأَكْبَرِ الْكَبَائِرِ - ثَلاَثًا - الإِشْرَاكُ بِاللَّهِ وَعُقُوقُ الْوَالِدَيْنِ وَشَهَادَةُ الزُّورِ أَوْ قَوْلُ الزُّورِ
Abu Bakra that his father said - We were in the company of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) that he observed: Should I not inform you about the most grievous of the grave sins He repeated it three times, and then said: Associating anyone with Allah, disobedience to parents, false testimony or false utterance. The Prophet was reclining, then he sat up, and he repeated it so many times that we wished that he should become silent
We know the famous hadith about the best generations. Many don’t know what the narrator added at the end
قَالَ سَمِعْتُ عِمْرَانَ بْنَ حُصَيْنٍ ـ رضى الله عنهما ـ قَالَ قَالَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم " خَيْرُكُمْ قَرْنِي، ثُمَّ الَّذِينَ يَلُونَهُمْ، ثُمَّ الَّذِينَ يَلُونَهُمْ ". قَالَ عِمْرَانُ لاَ أَدْرِي أَذَكَرَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم بَعْدُ قَرْنَيْنِ أَوْ ثَلاَثَةً. قَالَ النَّبِيُّ صلى الله عليه وسلم " إِنَّ بَعْدَكُمْ قَوْمًا يَخُونُونَ وَلاَ يُؤْتَمَنُونَ، وَيَشْهَدُونَ، وَلاَ يُسْتَشْهَدُونَ وَيَنْذِرُونَ وَلاَ يَفُونَ، وَيَظْهَرُ فِيهِمُ السِّمَنُ ".
I heard `Imran bin Husain saying, "The Prophet said, 'The best people are those living in my generation, then those coming after them, and then those coming after (the second generation)." `Imran said "I do not know whether the Prophet mentioned two or three generations after your present generation. The Prophet added, 'There will be some people after you, who will be dishonest and will not be trustworthy and will give witness (evidences) without being asked to give witness, and will vow but will not fulfill their vows, and obesity will appear among them
يَشهَدونَ ولا يُستَشهَدونَ)) فقال: (أحَدُها: أنَّه مَحمولٌ على
شَهادةِ الزُّورِ
Ibn Hajr mentioned many possible explanations and one of them being giving false evidence / testimony
عبد الله بن مسعود رضي الله عنه قوله - صلّى الله عليه وسلم -: إن بين يدي السّاعة: ... شهادة الزور، وكتمان شهادة الحق
Abdullah bin Masood narration from Prophet who mentioned the signs of the hour and he included false evidence / testimony and concealing the truth
وظهورها دليلٌ على ضعف الإِيمان، وعدم الخوف من الرّحمن
Its emergence is evidence upon the weakness of faith, and the lack of fear of the Rahman
1 week ago (edited) | [YT] | 36
View 3 replies
Bro Hajji
Ibn Qayyim mentioned something powerful:
لو نَفَع العِلمُ بلا عمَل لَمَا ذَمَّ اللهُ سبحانه أَحبارَ أَهلِ الكِتاب، ولو نَفَع العَملُ بلا إخلاص لَمَا ذَمَّ المنافقين.
“If knowledge without action was of any benefit, Allah would not have criticised the Rabbis from the People of the Book, and if action without sincerity was of any benefit, He would not have criticised the hypocrites.”
The harsh truth is, in our day and age, we find many who don’t apply the knowledge they have gained. Rather, they use it for their own personal benefit and advancement. The religion has become a vehicle to fulfil their own purposes, objectives, and goals.
قال الخطيب البغدادي رحمه الله: كما لا تنفع الأموال إلا بإنفاقها، كذلك لا تنفع العلوم إلا لمن عَمِل بها.
Khateeb Al-Baghdadi said: “Just as money is of no benefit unless it is spent, likewise knowledge is of no benefit except for those who act upon it.”
قال مالك بن دينار: العبد إذا تعلم العلم لغير العمل زاده فخرًا.
Malik ibn Dinar said: “If a servant learns knowledge for other than action, it only increases him in pride.”
I will conclude by saying: we have too many wolves in sheep’s clothing.
1 week ago | [YT] | 59
View 3 replies
Bro Hajji
The inconsistencies only get worse! @HamzasDen
2 weeks ago | [YT] | 16
View 2 replies
Bro Hajji
I wasn’t lying? They are corrupt and profit from the suffering of our brothers and sisters!
2 weeks ago | [YT] | 139
View 15 replies
Bro Hajji
Gaza Genocide – Who Profits From It?
The difference between military contractors (and the companies behind them) and Islamic charities is that military contractors provide services such as logistics, construction, and weapons manufacturing services that directly contribute to the genocide. In contrast, charities operate with humanitarian intentions, aiming to alleviate the suffering caused by the conflict.
Yet, despite their opposing roles, they share one critical commonality: both profit immensely from the genocide.
2 weeks ago | [YT] | 67
View 7 replies
Bro Hajji
No aid has entered the Strip since 2nd March 2025.
Ramadan started in early March, and every charity, through their sponsored ads, claimed they were sending food packs into Gaza, knowing that no aid was entering. Yet, they continued collecting and receiving millions in donations. I would like to ask all these charities: what happened to your aid trucks or food packs?
May Allah curse anyone who is exploiting this genocide… آمين
2 weeks ago | [YT] | 211
View 11 replies
Load more