Why was there no planned obsolescence in East Germany? Because the (large-scale) industrial means of production were publicly owned. In capitalism, these are privately owned. Private owners want to realize the return on their investments. They can only do this through mass production. Technically, for example, Samsung could build smartphones whose memory or other components can be expanded and replaced, whose batteries are replaceable, and which still serve their purpose in 10 years or more, provided the software is updated accordingly. But then they wouldn't sell these masses of new smartphones anymore, with the result that their investments in production facilities would be devalued. That's why an effective environmental policy isn't really possible under capitalist production conditions and ownership structures. Because it would require a de facto expropriation of the capitalists. But which neo-right-winger knows this? And which social patriot openly calls for overcoming capitalist production conditions and ownership structures? How many among today's right-wingers do you know who are even capable of thinking that far ahead?
One must stay away from modern things like "Duginism”. There is enough philosophical, artistic, political & historical intellectual material present in the past for anyone who’s interested, that old material possses an original soul & voice.
We will not go into a critique of Dugin here because it is simply pointless. If one wants to seriously evaluate our situation then we must look for principled men who have written principled texts, The modern world simply isn’t capable of producing principled men, that is why no modern philosopher or intellectual post-1960’s is worth anything.
Once published by Swiss television as "PLATO UND NIETZSCHE - Un-Zeitgenossen im Gespräch", a fictional dialog written by the German philosophy professor Wilhelm Weischedel.
The actor who plays Nietzsche is brilliant & eerily identical to him, it almost seems as if he’s the real nietzsche. I can only wonder who this gentleman really is & how they came to find & cast him. This piece is a german creation & small things like these keep on reminding me what germany once was, There’s something about this film that makes it more than what it really is, maybe it’s just me or this film embodies the german soul & spirit in the way in which it is shot, acted, written & directed. The whole piece is so tasteful & one can feel the whole weight of germanism behind it. Things like this are vanishing day by day, even this small film is a product of the remains of a once great culture of whose ruins made this. Simply said, This film contains & embodies a form of culture & character which has almost gone extinct from the world, to be blunt "a superior culture”.
The type of hands & mind who produced this are no longer available on earth. These sensibilities must be reclaimed, The whole point of this channel is to provide the viewers with certain "Superior Sensibilities” through music, images & footage. To awaken these sensibilities through literary education is an extensive, long & proper way but this channel doesn’t wish to do that, the purpose of this channel is to speak to the "irrational soul”, to awaken the feelings spiritually & primordially through images & music, once that form of inner primordial awakening is achieved, The awakened will then himself go towards the literary route of proper education.
The soldiers who died in the trenches were not intellectuals but men who were simply awakened to the sensibilities that lie beneath the pen. As bowden once said that "you don’t speak to the mind, you speak to what’s underneath the mind". We believe that this spiritual awakening is much more important than the intellectual arming for the latter is nothing without the former. It has always been the spirit which has made revolution possible not the intellect, Our task of recovery can only be made possible by the primordial & spirit for what we intend to recover was primarily at the base formed by it
One of the greatest quote from one of history’s most ruthless executioners
“Effective struggle against the enemy must derive from recognition of the fact that all visible, apparent enemies are but the tip of the iceberg of eternal, unchanging dangerous spiritual forces.”
"Addressing the incredulous and hostile crowd, before committing suicide, Mishima shouted his accusation against Japan, drunk on prosperity and sunk in spiritual inactivity. He criticized pacifism and called for the awakening of eternal Japan."
“History is a record of the domination of the weak by the strong, and no amount of moralizing can alter that fact. Moreover, attempts to ignore or deny biological inequality are among the most dangerous self-deceptions of modern man.”
The most competent phase of the Soviet Union regarding state power projection was during the era of J3w!sh leadership. It was the Jaws with the help of their cousins in Paris, London, and New York, who turned the Romanov serfdom into a massive factory. You can be sure that if a Slav was in charge of de-kulakization, the number of Kulaks would have quadrupled after the first 2 years of the program. Notwithstanding the fact that even the earlier industrialization was either done by Americans or copied from them. The most radical historical political act of an East Slav is pogrom based on a rumor he heard in his local tavern.East Slav, where's your Hussite? Where's your Szlachta? Only Imported byzatine religion, superstitious peasant-slaves and whip holding cossack bandits?
Like Ludwig Feuerbach before him, Nietzsche recognizes in the philosophy of spirit, from René Descartes to Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, a continuation of Christian theology. His critique of consciousness and of the will is therefore at once a critique of the Christian interpretation of the world.
Nietzsche places the theological, moral, and hedonistic interpretations on the same level. All are interpretive constructions, measuring life according to categories drawn from consciousness: pleasure and displeasure, good and evil. Instead of recognizing consciousness as a tool within life, the relation is inverted, and a supposed spiritual world is imposed as the standard by which life is judged.
For this reason, any overarching consciousness of becoming must be denied, any over-God, so that what happens is not placed under the gaze of a being that observes, sympathizes, and yet wills nothing. Once such a being is assumed, once belief in a “true” world behind the apparent one, in morality, in the highest values and purposes of life collapses under its own logic, a condition emerges in which this fundamental error spreads everywhere, like a contagion introduced into a healthy body. At that point, nihilism appears. Nihilism means that the highest values devalue themselves. It is the logic of our ideals carried through to completion.
No tribunal stands above it. This is the innocence of becoming. Life has no judge. To judge existence is itself an absurdity.
For the realist, to determine what is, and how it is, stands infinitely higher than any claim that it ought to be otherwise. “Man as he should be” is no less absurd than “a tree as it should be.” Morality consists entirely of wishes, projections, of what is not.
It is precisely when man invents ideals for himself that he diminishes. Man deserves respect not when measured by his desires, but when seen in his capacity to endure, to struggle, to overcome circumstances, and to prevail over opposition. Measured by his desires, he appears as the most absurd of creatures.
Within every desire lies an element of weakness, a longing for refuge, for rest from strength, for escape from struggle.
From a philosophical standpoint, the exclusion of any ideal final state through the concept of innocence is decisive. The present belongs to innocence. It must not be justified by reference to a future, nor the past by reference to the present. Every such justification introduces a standard external to becoming.
He did not merely describe, from a position of distance, the ruins surrounding modern man. He made visible the order that persists beneath them, the order that has always been and will remain. This demonstration of enduring order is his central philosophical achievement. It stands inseparable from his affirmation of fate.
Nietzsche dismantled the false order imposed by consciousness in order to restore, within thought, the true order of the will to power. In the same movement, he denied the moral God any right to exist, not by opposing divinity as such, but by rejecting the interpretation that subjects existence to moral judgment.
All of these efforts were directed toward a single aim: to attain a state of complete irresponsibility, to place oneself beyond praise and blame, beyond past and present, in order to proceed along one’s own path. When Nietzsche first conceived the work that was to become his principal philosophical project, for which Thus Spoke Zarathustra was to serve only as a prelude, he considered the title: “The Innocence of Becoming: A Guide to the Redemption of Morality.”
“Japan was to be married, not to H!tl€r, but to the German forests; not to Mussølîni, but to the Roman pantheon. It was a pact joining German, Roman, and Japanese mythology: a friendship among the beautiful, masculine, pagan gods of East and West.”
NEW-AGE
Why was there no planned obsolescence in East Germany? Because the (large-scale) industrial means of production were publicly owned. In capitalism, these are privately owned. Private owners want to realize the return on their investments. They can only do this through mass production. Technically, for example, Samsung could build smartphones whose memory or other components can be expanded and replaced, whose batteries are replaceable, and which still serve their purpose in 10 years or more, provided the software is updated accordingly. But then they wouldn't sell these masses of new smartphones anymore, with the result that their investments in production facilities would be devalued. That's why an effective environmental policy isn't really possible under capitalist production conditions and ownership structures. Because it would require a de facto expropriation of the capitalists. But which neo-right-winger knows this? And which social patriot openly calls for overcoming capitalist production conditions and ownership structures? How many among today's right-wingers do you know who are even capable of thinking that far ahead?
2 days ago | [YT] | 4
View 0 replies
NEW-AGE
One must stay away from modern things like "Duginism”. There is enough philosophical, artistic, political & historical intellectual material present in the past for anyone who’s interested, that old material possses an original soul & voice.
We will not go into a critique of Dugin here because it is simply pointless.
If one wants to seriously evaluate our situation then we must look for principled men who have written principled texts, The modern world simply isn’t capable of producing principled men, that is why no modern philosopher or intellectual post-1960’s is worth anything.
2 days ago (edited) | [YT] | 5
View 0 replies
NEW-AGE
Once published by Swiss television as "PLATO UND NIETZSCHE - Un-Zeitgenossen im Gespräch", a fictional dialog written by the German philosophy professor Wilhelm Weischedel.
The actor who plays Nietzsche is brilliant & eerily identical to him, it almost seems as if he’s the real nietzsche. I can only wonder who this gentleman really is & how they came to find & cast him.
This piece is a german creation & small things like these keep on reminding me what germany once was, There’s something about this film that makes it more than what it really is, maybe it’s just me or this film embodies the german soul & spirit in the way in which it is shot, acted, written & directed. The whole piece is so tasteful & one can feel the whole weight of germanism behind it. Things like this are vanishing day by day, even this small film is a product of the remains of a once great culture of whose ruins made this.
Simply said, This film contains & embodies a form of culture & character which has almost gone extinct from the world, to be blunt "a superior culture”.
The type of hands & mind who produced this are no longer available on earth. These sensibilities must be reclaimed, The whole point of this channel is to provide the viewers with certain "Superior Sensibilities” through music, images & footage. To awaken these sensibilities through literary education is an extensive, long & proper way but this channel doesn’t wish to do that, the purpose of this channel is to speak to the "irrational soul”, to awaken the feelings spiritually & primordially through images & music, once that form of inner primordial awakening is achieved, The awakened will then himself go towards the literary route of proper education.
The soldiers who died in the trenches were not intellectuals but men who were simply awakened to the sensibilities that lie beneath the pen. As bowden once said that "you don’t speak to the mind, you speak to what’s underneath the mind". We believe that this spiritual awakening is much more important than the intellectual arming for the latter is nothing without the former.
It has always been the spirit which has made revolution possible not the intellect, Our task of recovery can only be made possible by the primordial & spirit for what we intend to recover was primarily at the base formed by it
1 week ago (edited) | [YT] | 6
View 0 replies
NEW-AGE
One of the greatest quote from one of history’s most ruthless executioners
“Effective struggle against the enemy must derive from recognition of the fact that all visible, apparent enemies are but the tip of the iceberg of eternal, unchanging dangerous spiritual forces.”
1 week ago | [YT] | 3
View 0 replies
NEW-AGE
"Addressing the incredulous and hostile crowd, before committing suicide, Mishima shouted his accusation against Japan, drunk on prosperity and sunk in spiritual inactivity. He criticized pacifism and called for the awakening of eternal Japan."
— Marcello Veneziani
3 weeks ago | [YT] | 13
View 2 replies
NEW-AGE
"500 Years of British Art” : Jonathan Bowden
This is a newly released film featuring the now legendary Jonathan Bowden by "Patriotic Aternative” on youtube, The link to which is attatched below.
https://youtu.be/W3Gc5EWEO6o?si=tUYcc...
3 weeks ago (edited) | [YT] | 3
View 0 replies
NEW-AGE
“History is a record of the domination of the weak by the strong, and no amount of moralizing can alter that fact. Moreover, attempts to ignore or deny biological inequality are among the most dangerous self-deceptions of modern man.”
— H. P. Lovecraft
4 weeks ago | [YT] | 4
View 0 replies
NEW-AGE
The most competent phase of the Soviet Union regarding state power projection was during the era of J3w!sh leadership. It was the Jaws with the help of their cousins in Paris, London, and New York, who turned the Romanov serfdom into a massive factory. You can be sure that if a Slav was in charge of de-kulakization, the number of Kulaks would have quadrupled after the first 2 years of the program. Notwithstanding the fact that even the earlier industrialization was either done by Americans or copied from them. The most radical historical political act of an East Slav is pogrom based on a rumor he heard in his local tavern.East Slav, where's your Hussite? Where's your Szlachta? Only Imported byzatine religion, superstitious peasant-slaves and whip holding cossack bandits?
-penzberger_traumnacht
1 month ago (edited) | [YT] | 1
View 0 replies
NEW-AGE
Like Ludwig Feuerbach before him, Nietzsche recognizes in the philosophy of spirit, from René Descartes to Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, a continuation of Christian theology. His critique of consciousness and of the will is therefore at once a critique of the Christian interpretation of the world.
Nietzsche places the theological, moral, and hedonistic interpretations on the same level. All are interpretive constructions, measuring life according to categories drawn from consciousness: pleasure and displeasure, good and evil. Instead of recognizing consciousness as a tool within life, the relation is inverted, and a supposed spiritual world is imposed as the standard by which life is judged.
For this reason, any overarching consciousness of becoming must be denied, any over-God, so that what happens is not placed under the gaze of a being that observes, sympathizes, and yet wills nothing. Once such a being is assumed, once belief in a “true” world behind the apparent one, in morality, in the highest values and purposes of life collapses under its own logic, a condition emerges in which this fundamental error spreads everywhere, like a contagion introduced into a healthy body. At that point, nihilism appears. Nihilism means that the highest values devalue themselves. It is the logic of our ideals carried through to completion.
No tribunal stands above it. This is the innocence of becoming. Life has no judge. To judge existence is itself an absurdity.
For the realist, to determine what is, and how it is, stands infinitely higher than any claim that it ought to be otherwise. “Man as he should be” is no less absurd than “a tree as it should be.” Morality consists entirely of wishes, projections, of what is not.
It is precisely when man invents ideals for himself that he diminishes. Man deserves respect not when measured by his desires, but when seen in his capacity to endure, to struggle, to overcome circumstances, and to prevail over opposition. Measured by his desires, he appears as the most absurd of creatures.
Within every desire lies an element of weakness, a longing for refuge, for rest from strength, for escape from struggle.
From a philosophical standpoint, the exclusion of any ideal final state through the concept of innocence is decisive. The present belongs to innocence. It must not be justified by reference to a future, nor the past by reference to the present. Every such justification introduces a standard external to becoming.
He did not merely describe, from a position of distance, the ruins surrounding modern man. He made visible the order that persists beneath them, the order that has always been and will remain. This demonstration of enduring order is his central philosophical achievement. It stands inseparable from his affirmation of fate.
Nietzsche dismantled the false order imposed by consciousness in order to restore, within thought, the true order of the will to power. In the same movement, he denied the moral God any right to exist, not by opposing divinity as such, but by rejecting the interpretation that subjects existence to moral judgment.
All of these efforts were directed toward a single aim: to attain a state of complete irresponsibility, to place oneself beyond praise and blame, beyond past and present, in order to proceed along one’s own path. When Nietzsche first conceived the work that was to become his principal philosophical project, for which Thus Spoke Zarathustra was to serve only as a prelude, he considered the title: “The Innocence of Becoming: A Guide to the Redemption of Morality.”
-Alfred Baeumler
1 month ago | [YT] | 3
View 0 replies
NEW-AGE
“Japan was to be married, not to H!tl€r, but to the German forests; not to Mussølîni, but to the Roman pantheon. It was a pact joining German, Roman, and Japanese mythology: a friendship among the beautiful, masculine, pagan gods of East and West.”
—Yukio Mishima
1 month ago | [YT] | 4
View 0 replies
Load more