The problem with what we mistakenly call the "original Hebrew Bible" (The medieval Masoretic Text) is that it makes Jesus and the Apostles liars.
"What do you mean Ben, that's crazy talk!"
Within the New Testament (the 2nd half of the Bible) Jesus and the Apostles directly quote the Old Testament (the 1st half of the Bible) over 250 times. And within these 250+ quotes, the Old Testament only matches roughly 10% of what is being quoted if we are to use the Masoretic Text Old Testament.
However, if we are to compare the New Testament quotes that Jesus and the Apostles make to the ancient Greek Old Testament Septuagint LXX, we see these were the actual Old Testament scriptures that Jesus and the Apostles were reading and quoting from, because they have a matching rate of over 90%.
For example, let's begin reading at 4:18 in the gospel of Luke (the New Testament.) We see that Jesus goes to the synagogue in Nazareth and stands up to read from the book of Isaiah and directly quotes chapter 61 verse 1.
But the problem is, if you are reading from the KJV (or any other Bible that uses the Masoretic Text for its Old Testament portion) when you actually turn to Isaiah 61:1 in your Old Testament to verify if the quote matches, you'll find it doesn't.
Something very important was removed by the Jesus hating Rabbis that re-wrote their scriptures (the Masoretic Text) in order to make Jesus a liar. They removed the miracle of "recovery of sight to the blind" which is exactly why Jesus was reading Isaiah 61:1 to proclaim that he was the Messiah that would perform this miracle (which he does in Mark 8:22 and Matthew 9:27)
BUT, If we check Isaiah 61:1 in the ancient Greek Old Testament Septuagint LXX (which is over 1,000 years older than the Masoretic Text) we see that YES! Jesus was in fact quoting Isaiah correctly, as we read that "recovery of sight to the blind" is absolutely written there.
Feel free to swipe through the images and graph I created to showcase this fascinating and important reality.
I must share this fantastic video by "TheHelpfulExJW" He nails it! I hope you enjoy his brilliant (and hilariously spicy) commentary as much as I did. He brings to light a lot of new information that I didn't know!
Did you know that in order to convert to Judaism you have to officially renounce Jesus Christ in a conversion ceremony?
That means Ivanka Trump who converted to Chabad Lubavitch Judaism officially renounced Jesus Christ as her Lord and Savior, as well as all of these people included in my graphic.
They probably fell victim to Hebrew Idolatry (just like most politicians and government owned 501c3 Churches.) They probably thought “hey, I could just skip Jesus and go straight to being "God's Chosen People.” Because that’s what the Bible teaches, right?
Hello my brothers and sisters in Christ! The 2 most common questions I have received from people after watching my documentary, is which version of the Greek Old Testament Septuagint LXX is best, and where can they get a copy? I created these graphics to help answer those questions.
Researcher Barry Setterfield has done extensive research in to the 3 main codices used in the translations of the LXX, and provides valuable answers to these questions, which I encourage everyone to read: www.barrysetterfield.org/Septuagint_History.html#c…
Barry Setterfield uses a quick litmus test to verify if the LXX you're reading has been influenced by the Rabbinical corruptions in the Masoretic Text or not. If it passes these 3 qualifications, then your LXX should be considered good to go. Check the graphics I created for the 3 litmus test questions: Psalms 40:6, Deuteronomy 32:43, and the Genesis 5+11 chronologies.
This is a link to the exact copy of the LXX that I use and love. a.co/d/cg3J3hg It is the Brenton English translation of the Greek Old Testament Septuagint, which is the source I used for the information, graphs, and charts that I created in my documentary.
This version of the Brenton LXX passes all three check-offs in the litmus test. What's cool about this version is that it has the Greek and English side by side, and you can see for yourself that the mighty name of JESUS ( Ἰησοῦς ) was indeed used for the prophet Joshua. (disclaimer: I have no affiliation or partnership with the sellers of this LXX. I'm just sharing what I use personally.)
Brenton's version of the Greek Old Testament Septuagint LXX does in fact contain the Apocrypha, but please know that these are not the heretical gnostic books of other apocryphas. The Apocrypha contained in this LXX is the same as the Deuterocanonical books that were also included in the 1560 Geneva Bible as well as the original KJV 1611 Bible. For more information on these Apocryphal books please watch this great video of an interview with historian David Bercot: https://youtu.be/ZAh5681yVl4?si=Cm8kF...
I also get asked about the New Testament portions of the Bible. And so I want to make it clear that I am exposing only the Old Testament portion of the Bible to be corrupted from Rabbinical revisions (The Masoretic Text translation to be specific). It is not the New Testament that is corrupted. I believe the New Testament is trustworthy. However, there are 2 different manuscript lines that we get our New Testaments from, and there are some differences between the two! I recommend getting a Bible from EACH of those lines, so you can compare and read them yourself!
For example, I love the Geneva Bible translation (old English grammar style) and that comes from the Antioch line of manuscripts, and I also love reading from the NASB or ESV (modern English grammar style) both of which come from the Alexandrian line of manuscripts. Here's a great resource page for more information on the New Testament: reasonsforhopejesus.com/what-are-the-two-manuscrip…
I love you my brothers and sisters in Christ. You can email me with other questions you have: benbornagain.faith@gmail.com
Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord and in the power of His might. Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.
For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.
Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. Stand therefore, having girded your waist with truth, having put on the breastplate of righteousness, and having shod your feet with the preparation of the gospel of peace; above all, taking the shield of faith with which you will be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked one.
And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God; praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, being watchful to this end with all perseverance and supplication for all the saints.
When people tell you that the name Jesus is a “Roman/Catholic/Constantine” invention please tell them that the name of Jesus —> Ἰησοῦς was used by the Jews centuries before the Roman Empire even existed.
How do we know this? Because the oldest translation of the “Hebrew” scriptures that exist today is (ironically) The Greek Old Testament Septuagint LXX, translated 285 BC. In this authoritative translation, the Jews used the name of Jesus —> Ἰησοῦς as the name for the prophet Joshua (not the other way around.)
This means that the Jews were literally using the name Jesus hundreds of years before the Roman Empire was even established in 27 BC.
And this is why the Apostles and the authors of the New Testament manuscripts (all written in Greek, not Hebrew, not Aramaic) continued writing the mighty name of —> Ἰησοῦς, for the Son of God.
Praise our mighty Lord, Savior, and King, Christ JESUS! 🙏✝️💪
BEN BORN AGAIN
My dear brothers and sisters in Christ,
The problem with what we mistakenly call the "original Hebrew Bible" (The medieval Masoretic Text) is that it makes Jesus and the Apostles liars.
"What do you mean Ben, that's crazy talk!"
Within the New Testament (the 2nd half of the Bible) Jesus and the Apostles directly quote the Old Testament (the 1st half of the Bible) over 250 times. And within these 250+ quotes, the Old Testament only matches roughly 10% of what is being quoted if we are to use the Masoretic Text Old Testament.
However, if we are to compare the New Testament quotes that Jesus and the Apostles make to the ancient Greek Old Testament Septuagint LXX, we see these were the actual Old Testament scriptures that Jesus and the Apostles were reading and quoting from, because they have a matching rate of over 90%.
For example, let's begin reading at 4:18 in the gospel of Luke (the New Testament.) We see that Jesus goes to the synagogue in Nazareth and stands up to read from the book of Isaiah and directly quotes chapter 61 verse 1.
But the problem is, if you are reading from the KJV (or any other Bible that uses the Masoretic Text for its Old Testament portion) when you actually turn to Isaiah 61:1 in your Old Testament to verify if the quote matches, you'll find it doesn't.
Something very important was removed by the Jesus hating Rabbis that re-wrote their scriptures (the Masoretic Text) in order to make Jesus a liar. They removed the miracle of "recovery of sight to the blind" which is exactly why Jesus was reading Isaiah 61:1 to proclaim that he was the Messiah that would perform this miracle (which he does in Mark 8:22 and Matthew 9:27)
BUT, If we check Isaiah 61:1 in the ancient Greek Old Testament Septuagint LXX (which is over 1,000 years older than the Masoretic Text) we see that YES! Jesus was in fact quoting Isaiah correctly, as we read that "recovery of sight to the blind" is absolutely written there.
Feel free to swipe through the images and graph I created to showcase this fascinating and important reality.
Grace and peace!
23 hours ago (edited) | [YT] | 236
View 86 replies
BEN BORN AGAIN
I must share this fantastic video by "TheHelpfulExJW" He nails it! I hope you enjoy his brilliant (and hilariously spicy) commentary as much as I did. He brings to light a lot of new information that I didn't know!
1 day ago | [YT] | 15
View 4 replies
BEN BORN AGAIN
This is incredibly relevant to what’s taking place today, especially when we consider that the current occupation is a Satanic Rothschild counterfeit.
1 day ago | [YT] | 256
View 75 replies
BEN BORN AGAIN
If it was good enough for Jesus to quote, it’s good enough for me. 🙏✝️💪
More information on the LXX: youtube.com/post/UgkxqekT5ZQZkWerR341Dw3QAny9AAV0l…
2 days ago (edited) | [YT] | 258
View 80 replies
BEN BORN AGAIN
Did you know that in order to convert to Judaism you have to officially renounce Jesus Christ in a conversion ceremony?
That means Ivanka Trump who converted to Chabad Lubavitch Judaism officially renounced Jesus Christ as her Lord and Savior, as well as all of these people included in my graphic.
They probably fell victim to Hebrew Idolatry (just like most politicians and government owned 501c3 Churches.) They probably thought “hey, I could just skip Jesus and go straight to being "God's Chosen People.” Because that’s what the Bible teaches, right?
1 week ago | [YT] | 591
View 178 replies
BEN BORN AGAIN
Hello my brothers and sisters in Christ! The 2 most common questions I have received from people after watching my documentary, is which version of the Greek Old Testament Septuagint LXX is best, and where can they get a copy? I created these graphics to help answer those questions.
Researcher Barry Setterfield has done extensive research in to the 3 main codices used in the translations of the LXX, and provides valuable answers to these questions, which I encourage everyone to read: www.barrysetterfield.org/Septuagint_History.html#c…
Barry Setterfield uses a quick litmus test to verify if the LXX you're reading has been influenced by the Rabbinical corruptions in the Masoretic Text or not. If it passes these 3 qualifications, then your LXX should be considered good to go. Check the graphics I created for the 3 litmus test questions: Psalms 40:6, Deuteronomy 32:43, and the Genesis 5+11 chronologies.
This is a link to the exact copy of the LXX that I use and love. a.co/d/cg3J3hg It is the Brenton English translation of the Greek Old Testament Septuagint, which is the source I used for the information, graphs, and charts that I created in my documentary.
This version of the Brenton LXX passes all three check-offs in the litmus test. What's cool about this version is that it has the Greek and English side by side, and you can see for yourself that the mighty name of JESUS ( Ἰησοῦς ) was indeed used for the prophet Joshua. (disclaimer: I have no affiliation or partnership with the sellers of this LXX. I'm just sharing what I use personally.)
Brenton's version of the Greek Old Testament Septuagint LXX does in fact contain the Apocrypha, but please know that these are not the heretical gnostic books of other apocryphas. The Apocrypha contained in this LXX is the same as the Deuterocanonical books that were also included in the 1560 Geneva Bible as well as the original KJV 1611 Bible. For more information on these Apocryphal books please watch this great video of an interview with historian David Bercot: https://youtu.be/ZAh5681yVl4?si=Cm8kF...
I also get asked about the New Testament portions of the Bible. And so I want to make it clear that I am exposing only the Old Testament portion of the Bible to be corrupted from Rabbinical revisions (The Masoretic Text translation to be specific). It is not the New Testament that is corrupted. I believe the New Testament is trustworthy. However, there are 2 different manuscript lines that we get our New Testaments from, and there are some differences between the two! I recommend getting a Bible from EACH of those lines, so you can compare and read them yourself!
For example, I love the Geneva Bible translation (old English grammar style) and that comes from the Antioch line of manuscripts, and I also love reading from the NASB or ESV (modern English grammar style) both of which come from the Alexandrian line of manuscripts. Here's a great resource page for more information on the New Testament: reasonsforhopejesus.com/what-are-the-two-manuscrip…
I love you my brothers and sisters in Christ. You can email me with other questions you have: benbornagain.faith@gmail.com
-BEN
1 week ago (edited) | [YT] | 143
View 124 replies
BEN BORN AGAIN
2 weeks ago | [YT] | 208
View 88 replies
BEN BORN AGAIN
—The Whole Armor of God—
Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord and in the power of His might. Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.
For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.
Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. Stand therefore, having girded your waist with truth, having put on the breastplate of righteousness, and having shod your feet with the preparation of the gospel of peace; above all, taking the shield of faith with which you will be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked one.
And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God; praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, being watchful to this end with all perseverance and supplication for all the saints.
—Ephesians 6:10-18
2 weeks ago | [YT] | 100
View 9 replies
BEN BORN AGAIN
When people tell you that the name Jesus is a “Roman/Catholic/Constantine” invention please tell them that the name of Jesus —> Ἰησοῦς was used by the Jews centuries before the Roman Empire even existed.
How do we know this? Because the oldest translation of the “Hebrew” scriptures that exist today is (ironically) The Greek Old Testament Septuagint LXX, translated 285 BC. In this authoritative translation, the Jews used the name of Jesus —> Ἰησοῦς as the name for the prophet Joshua (not the other way around.)
This means that the Jews were literally using the name Jesus hundreds of years before the Roman Empire was even established in 27 BC.
And this is why the Apostles and the authors of the New Testament manuscripts (all written in Greek, not Hebrew, not Aramaic) continued writing the mighty name of —> Ἰησοῦς, for the Son of God.
Praise our mighty Lord, Savior, and King, Christ JESUS!
🙏✝️💪
3 weeks ago (edited) | [YT] | 127
View 96 replies
BEN BORN AGAIN
The New Covenant: The Law of Liberty - Part 4 (the final graphic in the series) 🙏✝️💪
2 months ago | [YT] | 50
View 16 replies
Load more