The Law Requisites Ph

1 day ago | [YT] | 2

The Law Requisites Ph

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3

1 day ago | [YT] | 0

The Law Requisites Ph

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4

1 day ago | [YT] | 2

The Law Requisites Ph

Uncertainty often arises when a job offer is withdrawn before the employee’s first day of work.

This is a labor law case for illegal dismissal entitled Paolo Landayan Aragones v. Alltech Biotechnology Corporation, et al., G.R. No. 251736, promulgated on April 2, 2025. Aragones accepted Alltech’s written job offer with a future start date, but the company later withdrew it citing redundancy. The Supreme Court held that an employer-employee relationship was already perfected upon acceptance of the offer, and that the alleged redundancy was unproven, rendering the dismissal illegal.

#PhilippineLaborLaw
#EmployerEmployeeRelationship
#JobOfferAccepted
#IllegalDismissalPH
#RedundancyDoctrine
#SuspensivePeriod
#EmploymentContract
#SupremeCourtPH
#LaborJurisprudence
#WorkersRightsPH
#LegalEducationPH
#AragonesVsAlltech

Disclaimer: This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Jurisprudence applies depending on specific facts. For legal concerns, consult a qualified lawyer.

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4

1 day ago | [YT] | 2

The Law Requisites Ph

Latest jurisprudence: released Dec 22, 2025

Judicial integrity is fundamentally threatened when those sworn to uphold the law themselves commit grave crimes.

This is an administrative case for judicial discipline entitled Judicial Integrity Board v. Presiding Judge Oscar D. Tomarong, involving the Judicial Integrity Board as complainant and Judge Oscar D. Tomarong as respondent, docketed as A.M. No. RTJ-25-085, promulgated on July 29, 2025. The Supreme Court found that Judge Tomarong masterminded the murder of a fellow judge, a crime involving moral turpitude, and ruled that substantial evidence suffices for administrative liability, warranting his dismissal from the judiciary and disbarment.

1 week ago | [YT] | 7

The Law Requisites Ph

Sex Reassignment and Civil Registry in the Philippines: The Silverio v. Republic Doctrine Explained

www.facebook.com/100089499308282/subscribe/

Can a Filipino change their legal sex and name after sex reassignment surgery? This jurisprudence-based explainer of Silverio v. Republic (G.R. No. 174689, October 22, 2007) discusses why Philippine law does not yet recognize changes of sex in birth certificates, clarifying the limits of equity, civil registry rules, and legislative authority.

If science and identity evolve faster than the law, should courts adapt through equity—or must Congress always take the first step?

#SilverioVsRepublic #PhilippineJurisprudence #CivilRegistryLaw #GenderIdentityLaw #RA9048 #SupremeCourtPH #LawRequisitesPH #LegalEducationPH #PhilippineLawExplained

Disclaimer:
This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Jurisprudential interpretations may change. While carefully prepared, this material is not infallible and was generated with the assistance of premium artificial intelligence.

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4

1 week ago | [YT] | 5

The Law Requisites Ph

Imagine this… you are legally adopted, bearing your adoptive father’s surname, yet publicly known under your biological father’s famous name. You ask the court: can identity follow blood over law?
Background & Facts: Francis Luigi G. Santos sought to change his surname to “Revilla.” No money was involved. The RTC denied the petition; the CA affirmed, citing adoption laws.
Ruling: The Supreme Court of the Philippines ruled Rule 103 was proper but DENIED the change for lack of compelling reason.
Doctrine: Change of name is a privilege, not a right. Adoption severs legal ties; convenience or public image is insufficient.
Question: Should personal identity outweigh legal filiation? Comment, save, and follow to stay updated!

www.facebook.com/100089499308282/subscribe/

FAQs:
Q1: Can an adoptee change surname? Yes, but only for compelling reasons.
Q2: Does a screen name justify change? No.
Case: Santos v. Republic, G.R. No. 250520, May 5, 2021.
Disclaimer: For educational purposes only; not infallible. Generated with premium AI.

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4

1 week ago | [YT] | 3

The Law Requisites Ph

Family related jurisprudence

Can a Father Avoid Child Support Without a Written Demand? Supreme Court Ruling in Lacson v. Lacson

www.facebook.com/100089499308282/subscribe/

If a parent knows their child needs support but chooses silence over responsibility, should the law still protect that parent from liability?

Can a father escape liability for unpaid child support by claiming no formal written demand was made? In Lacson v. Lacson (G.R. No. 150644, August 28, 2006), the Philippine Supreme Court ruled that a father remains liable for support in arrears, even without a formal demand letter. This landmark case clarifies that child support is a legal obligation arising from need—not from paperwork—and that third parties who provide support may seek reimbursement under the Family Code of the Philippines.

#LacsonVsLacson
#ChildSupportPhilippines
#SupportInArrears
#FamilyCodePH
#PhilippineJurisprudence
#SupremeCourtPH
#ChildSupportLaw
#ParentalObligation
#LegalEducationPH
#KnowYourRightsPH

⚠️ Disclaimer

DISCLAIMER: This content is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws and jurisprudence may be interpreted differently depending on the specific facts of each case. For legal concerns or advice, consult a qualified lawyer or legal professional.

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4

1 week ago | [YT] | 3

The Law Requisites Ph

Family related jurisprudence

Can a Foreigner Be Jailed for Not Giving Child Support in the Philippines? | Supreme Court Ruling Explained (G.R. No. 193707)

Does citizenship shield a foreign parent from criminal liability for abandoning a child in the Philippines—or does Philippine law step in to protect the child’s right to support?

Can a foreign national be imprisoned for failing to give child support in the Philippines? Learn how the Supreme Court ruled in Del Socorro v. Van Wilsem (G.R. No. 193707, December 10, 2014), applying the Anti-Violence Against Women and Their Children Act (R.A. 9262) and the doctrine of processual presumption. A must-read for parents, lawyers, and Filipinos in cross-border family disputes.

#ChildSupportPhilippines
#RA9262
#PhilippineSupremeCourt
#FamilyLawPhilippines
#ForeignParentLiability
#ViolenceAgainstWomenAndChildren
#LegalRightsPH
#ChildSupportLaw
#PhilippineJurisprudence
#DelSocorroVsVanWilsem
#ProcessualPresumption
#CrossBorderFamilyLaw

⚠️ Disclaimer

Disclaimer: This material is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws and jurisprudence may change, and the application of legal principles depends on specific facts. For legal concerns, consult a qualified lawyer or appropriate legal authority.

1 week ago | [YT] | 5

The Law Requisites Ph

Supreme Court Doctrine Explained: RA 9262 Applies to Lesbian Relationships | G.R. No. 242133

Learn the key Supreme Court doctrines in G.R. No. 242133 (April 16, 2024) where the Court ruled that Republic Act No. 9262 (Anti-VAWC Law) applies even when the offender is a woman. This landmark ruling clarifies that VAWC is about power and intimate-partner violence, not gender, and affirms protection for women in same-sex relationships. Ideal for law students, lawyers, and Philippine jurisprudence followers.

If violence in intimate relationships is truly a power issue rather than a gender issue, should Philippine law move toward a fully gender-neutral domestic violence framework?

#RA9262
#VAWC
#PhilippineSupremeCourt
#LegalDoctrine
#PhilippineJurisprudence
#LawSchoolPH
#BarReviewPH
#LGBTQRightsPH
#DomesticViolenceLaw
#lawrequisitesph

Disclaimer

This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Content is not infallible and was generated using premium artificial intelligence.

Skip the Carousel

1 2 3 4

1 week ago | [YT] | 1