I enjoy your content for its depth, so shorts wouldn't really be that much of a benefit in my book. But most importantly, i want you to enjoy which ever content you create :)
3 years ago | 23
If you were to publish veeery simple but interesting recipes that don't really deserve a whole video in shorts, that would be a great idea, I think. Or maybe even a little series on basics of cooking (cutting, choosing right ingredients and so on) On a second thought, you may combine said shorts about the basics into a whole video
3 years ago (edited) | 73
Be careful with them. The guy from City Planner Plays said it messed up his avg view time stats and made his new videos get recommended less by the YT algo
3 years ago | 50
Andong !, your vids go way deep into a lot of what makes a dish, and thats what makes it great... shorts aren't good for recipes cause they're to quick to cover the details of a dish. but if you wanna experiment with the format then be my guest. i think your viewers will still support it 😅 👍
3 years ago | 11
It feels like a lot of creators are spamming far too many in recent weeks. I saw a channel today post 4 over the course of a few hours. A few a week would be okay if it helps the channels in some algorithm way. But overuse could do the opposite 🥴
3 years ago | 30
It's so frustrating that YouTube is pushing shorts so hard. They don't fit everyone's brand and essentially forcing them on creators and viewers is so scammy.
3 years ago | 9
I don’t even know why shorts are a thing. You could always just had made a short video before. Basically just to cater people who use TikTok.
3 years ago | 38
Once a week is okay but I prefer your long videos because I like all the informations I get about a specific topic.
3 years ago | 5
I dislike shorts because I generally watch YouTube cast on my television and shorts are not supported for that. So I would have to disconnect form the television watch the few second long short and then reconnect. the process of doing that usually takes longer than watching the short and it deletes my video que.
3 years ago | 21
Personally, I think shorts belong on Tiktok. I find them annoying due to the lack of detail/info, and never watch them.
3 years ago | 16
I wouldn't cater to the tik tok audience, even though it's big. I'm pretty sure that is how Joshua Weissman developed his current YouTube personality, and i have stopped watching his content since then
3 years ago | 23
The occasional short is okay but i have seen a few channels swap to just spamming them out. They are a useful to release when you are working on a longer video and need filler content.
3 years ago | 19
I find the general quality of shorts to be terrible with no value of watching.
3 years ago (edited) | 6
On the contrary. The videos with historical background are the best and a bit longer i think. Please do more of those.
3 years ago | 0
Shorts would be cool for small tip and simple recipes as long as they don't interfere with the usual great video quality
3 years ago | 0
Shorts are good but I don’t like when a channel only posts shorts so as long as they didn’t take away from your main content I see no reason why it would be a negative.
3 years ago | 9
I like most of your videos, so short or regular I think they'd be good, if no video at all is the alternative. Loved your stinky tofu video, btw!
3 years ago (edited) | 0
I would watch shorts if you published them, but I'm not convinced they're actually a good fit for your style. One of the things I value most about your videos is the research you put in for interesting background information about the foods you showcase here, and you just can't do that in 59 seconds.
3 years ago | 1
My Name Is Andong
Hey gang! Do you like watching Shorts? Would you like to see some on this channel? 👀
3 years ago | [YT] | 208