The world will be worse without celebrities because they give us joy
4 years ago | 1
These fools think that artist and celebrity are synonymous.
4 years ago | 1
Both honestly. (Worse) in a way because we wouldn’t be able to learn from all of their mistakes they make publicly, and not make them ourselves. “Wise men learn from others mistakes” and (better) because no celebrities equals no celebrity children, which means a whole bunch of people would grow up with better childhoods cause no trama just from being famous. And the impact it would have on the youth not being constantly influenced by some famous person with no education on anything they talk about. Kids would be themselves rather then constantly trying to be like the fictional representation of “people” they see on media.
4 years ago | 1
It would be worse without them cuz then what about music and their butiful voice
4 years ago (edited) | 2
Better I think. They’re role models for people. For example, lgbtq+ celebrities are role models for people struggling with their sexualities, and it’s good representation. Celebrities of colour are good representation for other people of colour, and it shows more diversity in the different communities. Granted there are some celebrities who are bad influences on kids and other people, but I believe that most of them are good. 😌
4 years ago | 0
They should stay plus music helps me to calm down also because I like music
4 years ago | 4
It would be worse. Without artists, how can we listen to music without the arts who make the songs? Also, music award shows wouldn't exist without artists, especially concerts.
4 years ago | 2
So much worse! We wouldn’t be able to listen to music! Or watch movies!
4 years ago | 1
Riveted
✨Would the world be better or worse without celebrities?
Celebrities Surprising Their Fans: https://youtu.be/Ljwiz1-7kCo
4 years ago | [YT] | 491