It's the only 2 dimensional representation on the planet that shows 3 accurate dimensions when photographed with Lidar...
4 years ago | 7
Please reorganize your shroud playlist so that a newcomer can get the whole picture of what you have uncovered when watching it from beginning to end!!
4 years ago | 4
Real or fabricated, I don’t care. It is a fascinating artifact and I look forward to hearing about your findings.
4 years ago | 7
I tried not to believe in it...but everytime I see a picture of it . . it's hard to describe but, I feel recognition. I just know that is the face of Yeshua.
4 years ago | 3
The Shroud should not be uncomfortable to discuss. It can be an article of faith, an historical footnote, or artistic curiosity. It is all of those and a talisman of a long ago time...
4 years ago | 1
Thanks for doing this. I am always interested in history revisions that are subjectively battled from either religous/non-religious sides. In my experience both opposites are equal to disregarding any evidence because of a biased mindset.
4 years ago
| 2
Wow, I saw the previous videos on this, didn't think it would be touched on again. I await very nervously.
4 years ago | 1
Have you looked at the book The Immortality Key? It's not directly related to the shroud research, but it explores aspects of early christianity that could offer some different avenues of interpreting some symbols and texts.
4 years ago | 1
Touchy subject to tackle but I trust you’ll do the best job on it... can’t wait to see it! 🙏
4 years ago | 1
I think the portrait in/from edessa would be a more “real” or original pic of the lord
4 years ago | 1
I'm interested. Let's see this video essay when it's ready! 👍
4 years ago | 1
I herd something about how the only way the image could have been made was from some explosions of light or jesus turning to light or something... i gotta look i to it but it was convincing..
4 years ago | 4
I thought it a fraud also until I saw a documentary on the researchers. I'm convinced it's real.
4 years ago | 0
If a cloth is wrapped/draped over a corpse it would not create a perfect shape of a man but a distorted figure. The shroud was clearly printed/painted/pressed flat to produce a picture like that. On top of that, its all based on the assumption that jezus was an actual person, there is basicly not one verifiable fact in the whole story.
4 years ago | 1
Considering when it came to light, the general mindset of that time, and that it was only one of 40 or so making the rounds, will say a lot.
4 years ago | 0
I have studied the Shroud, heard all the negative statements that secular scientists have said. But how would pollen from around Jerusalem have gotten on the linen or how the image came to be? God left the Shroud to strengthen our faith in Jesus Christ, death and resurrection.
4 years ago | 2
cf-apps7865
Many questions from new subs on my Shroud of Turin research. Just not the most comfortable thing to talk about. With all I have learned. Many say it is a medieval hoax. Exactly what I thought originally. I did not give a hoot about this subject when I started researching 2015. Thought a few hours would turn up a 6-8 hundred year old made up relic trying to confirm the NT story. After 5 years I am positive the NT is a story confirming what we call the Shroud today. Except a Roman version. Can't have a perceived miracle coming from the very people doing the rebelling in your eastern empire. A video upcoming. Josephus the Jewish historian mentions the Shroud in the 1rst century. And this has slipped trough the cracks. Historians will be taken to task also in this upcoming video.
4 years ago (edited) | [YT] | 419