This documentary might be interesting for you to watch. We do not agree with some of the claims that are made, because they are too short sighted and have no scientific foundations. It is a long watch, some 3.5 hours.
1) The molten-stones idea is really well done and well worked out. It might be correct. 2) They have failed to mention the drill holes and saw cuts also found on the Giza plateau that show clear signs of machining. 3) Their claims that "Egyptians" went Westwards are very weak. Just take it with a pinch of salt. 4) The idea of the meter seems correct. I think they are right, and that is similar to what we discovered as well, but through another route. The meter is much longer around than just a few centuries. I tested the water droplets idea on different surfaces and could not obtain the centimeter as a conclusive measure. It is clear that many ancient cultures knew the meter long before, but the exact origin is not so easy to claim. 5) The Egyptians knew about the speed of light. We wrote this "hidden" article on our website: mariobuildreps.com/giza-speed-light There's very little chance that the "Egyptians" did NOT know about the speed of light. 6) There is a huge conspiracy going on against ancient secret knowledge, in contrast to what the director says early in the movie. It is clear that many cathedrals were made from molded concrete or molded granite. That is truly a remarkable discovery. 7) They say that all Mayan structures were oriented to Sirius and that Teotihuacan is oriented at 14 degrees 7. That is incorrect. If we only look at Chichen Itza, we see many different structures (46) with different orientations, varying from 0 degrees up to +27 degrees. Only a few of them were coincidentally oriented to Sirius, the rest was not. What they say about the orientation of Teotihuacan was done to fit the direction of Sirius. In reality, Teotihuacan is oriented at 15.5 degrees. And that is not to Sirius, but to a former pole. The orientation of many Mayan, Inca, and Aztec sites are too irregular to make simple claims. They follow our proven pole sequences.
Mario Buildreps
This documentary might be interesting for you to watch. We do not agree with some of the claims that are made, because they are too short sighted and have no scientific foundations. It is a long watch, some 3.5 hours.
1) The molten-stones idea is really well done and well worked out. It might be correct.
2) They have failed to mention the drill holes and saw cuts also found on the Giza plateau that show clear signs of machining.
3) Their claims that "Egyptians" went Westwards are very weak. Just take it with a pinch of salt.
4) The idea of the meter seems correct. I think they are right, and that is similar to what we discovered as well, but through another route. The meter is much longer around than just a few centuries. I tested the water droplets idea on different surfaces and could not obtain the centimeter as a conclusive measure. It is clear that many ancient cultures knew the meter long before, but the exact origin is not so easy to claim.
5) The Egyptians knew about the speed of light. We wrote this "hidden" article on our website: mariobuildreps.com/giza-speed-light There's very little chance that the "Egyptians" did NOT know about the speed of light.
6) There is a huge conspiracy going on against ancient secret knowledge, in contrast to what the director says early in the movie. It is clear that many cathedrals were made from molded concrete or molded granite. That is truly a remarkable discovery.
7) They say that all Mayan structures were oriented to Sirius and that Teotihuacan is oriented at 14 degrees 7. That is incorrect. If we only look at Chichen Itza, we see many different structures (46) with different orientations, varying from 0 degrees up to +27 degrees. Only a few of them were coincidentally oriented to Sirius, the rest was not. What they say about the orientation of Teotihuacan was done to fit the direction of Sirius. In reality, Teotihuacan is oriented at 15.5 degrees. And that is not to Sirius, but to a former pole. The orientation of many Mayan, Inca, and Aztec sites are too irregular to make simple claims. They follow our proven pole sequences.
Enjoy watching!
Mario.
4 years ago | [YT] | 11