50 to 120 is too big, i think the most part of player play between 40 to 70
6 months ago
| 32
9950X3D & 5080 I get about 130 @1440p if I’m on a fresh wipe good server not moving I get 240+
6 months ago
| 4
I hope they utilize multicore more so that we can get more fps on the Intel CPU.
6 months ago | 0
100-120 Outpost / 150-250 everywhere else, capped at 230 which I often hit. 9800x3d literally makes you kill so many people because of FPS advantage. People jumping barricades now I just headshot tap them 😅 200 pop server
6 months ago (edited) | 0
Wipe day I start at 100fps then by mid wipe I'm at 30-70 depending on where I'm at in the map. I7 4790k rtx2080 with 16gb ram.
6 months ago | 0
i play on a 240hz monitor and get enough fps on comp settings lol current gen hardware goes hard
6 months ago
| 1
I play on a 3060 ti and I average over 200 fps on medium settings. But if I load into a main server I’m at a good 40 🤣
6 months ago | 0
120 140 with a ryzen5 7600x and a rtx4060 but some time in out post 100 or 110 and in big raid in main server high pop 90 some time drop even lower when theres a lot of stuff going on on the server
6 months ago | 0
Locked my PC at 60fps through graphics driver. And it only moves from there with a huge base nearby.
6 months ago | 0
9950x3d with 32gb ddr5 5090 @4k = barely holds 100 around the map, dips to low 80s 60 even. Sucks cause ill never max out the monitor at 240 😂😂. Highly unoptimised game, seems to get worse then better.... Edit again : Max sliders too
6 months ago (edited) | 0
Drizzza
How many FPS do you get in Rust on average?
6 months ago | [YT] | 11