" there’s a crucial caveat: the majority of these AMD failures occurred within Puget Systems’ own facilities, rather than in customers’ hands. This suggests a potential manufacturing or handling issue specific to Puget’s operations, rather than a widespread problem with AMD chips." From same article posted
8 months ago | 3
Meanwhile Jay be like „I switched back to AMD… and I have no regrets“ after switching to Intel 8 months before. You would think he knows how to make such a CPU operate safely. The mainstream tech bubble is so fucked up, I can‘t 😂 Thx for teaching people how to build and fix their own shit instead, Jufes
8 months ago (edited) | 18
It would seem that Puget has people that actually know what they're doing working for them and they're not just shipping out systems with everything set to auto and/or default settings.
8 months ago | 14
so all core oc is the way to go always with core and voltage lock? does pbo degrades from your experience jufes?
8 months ago | 0
Sort of missing some key context in here. The 11th gen (or was it 12th) had the highest failure rates and the word YET was used many times due to the difference in how long a system has been used. Also the numbers quoted are within margin of error of each other of ~1% between them and no idea of reletive sample size so ease up on the copium, Intel need a hit on that stuff too. Lastly as Puget are about productivity and multicore workloads not playing games its actually damning on Intel that they have less issues because they essentially down clock Intel CPUs as standard practice because they say the defualts are bad (also with AMD) and have been doing so since something like 2018. In other words this problem in their eyes is a 6 year old issue at least, not exactly a win for you to fanboi over
8 months ago | 3
Is there a way to hard limit voltage on an MSI motherboard?
8 months ago | 1
Mine is 14700 non K my 2 core is boost to 5.4 and V core is no more than 1.36 , I don’t have to do anything right ? My MB is Asrock B760M PG Lightning
8 months ago | 5
Oh joy so both platforms are trash then. This whole pc gaming has become more expensive and less fun then the other stuff I like to do, like hunting, fishing and prs shooting IRL. Wah wah. between competive gamers getting super sweety and FAFO hardware I mite as pay someone to kick me in the nuts.
8 months ago | 13
CAD software will prioritize a single core and momentarily boost the crap out of it while in random operation. My ryzen 3800X failed years ago due to the same problem that Intel is having right now. Nobody talked about it then, AMD rma'd the cpu and that was that. I lock the cores and undervolt both the cpu and gpu since then. 5 frames here or there when gaming doesnt matter at all. I do not compete on any level, just want a quiet and stable system.
8 months ago | 0
Said this from the start of this Intel crap. I bet more memory controllers fail on ryzen than Intel CPUs that degrade.
8 months ago | 0
please also throw some light on system agent voltage , vddq , max ring ratio , all of these are super imp
8 months ago | 0
A chip that is designed to boost to 95c never sit well with me. In the other hand 7800x3d being so voltage restricted is a blessing for out of the box experience
8 months ago | 8
what about 5800x3d? asking bc thats the cpu i have and not so knowledgable
8 months ago (edited) | 0
Puget, like many, don't quite grasp that you don't setup/tune AMD systems in the same way you do an Intel system. 99% AMD CPU failures can be attributed to motherboard unlike Intel which originally tried to point to motherboard makers but unfortunately not the issue. Personally, I've always questioned boost voltages since Zen+, so I either lock frequency or just turn off boost depending on system usage. I've never seen an AMD failure using boost, so let's not try to suck AMD into Intel's nightmare. It belongs to them and them only.
8 months ago | 19
Frame Chasers
Always LOCK YOUR CORES, AMD or Intel it doesn't matter, it will kill the CPU.
8 months ago | [YT] | 168