Julian Krause

Question: Do you prefer your desktop audio interface to have the mic inputs on the front or back?

1 year ago | [YT] | 70



@avocadoenjoyer8511

I think this is a great example of something where there's no one-size-fits-all answer. For any permanent setup (i.e. with a patchbay or no regular rewiring), I always prefer all I/O to be on the back. For temporary setups, or setups that change a lot, it just makes sense for some I/O to end up on the front. If I could only pick one, it would be back-only.

1 year ago | 10  

@JulianKrause

It's for an upcoming video, guess which one ;)

1 year ago | 11

@EdThorne

When are you launching your own audio interface, Julian? 😜

1 year ago | 6

@subrezon

My perfect desktop audio interface has: - XLR in, USB and line out on the back - 1/4" in, headphone jack and all controls on the front - Flat top for mounting under the desk

1 year ago | 2

@Badmuthaa

For a permanent desktop set up with a boom arm back side for sure. Only cable I want at the front is a headphone out from my amp.

1 year ago | 2

@akipan

Now that I'm using the SSL 12 for the past year I have to say that having the connections in the back reduces the clutter of cables. And connections like instruments in the front helps you change guitars and bases much faster.

1 year ago | 1

@RedshiftDougal

If we're talking XLR connections (balanced) and a relatively small and cramped desk area between the interface and me, I prefer the connectors to be on the back. The cable length doesn't matter, so I'll happily route them out and round the back/under to leave more space clear for my keyboard, notepad, etc.

1 year ago | 10  

@bigtb1717

In my case, I prefer the XLR inputs be on the back, so I don't have cables looping around my desk. I run the cables down behind the desk. It looks much cleaner if the cables are plugged in the back. But I can definitely see how some would want them in the front.

1 year ago | 1

@mogwix

Both! I wish the rackmount interfaces had 8 XLR inputs on the rear AND two on the front. If it could only be one though I'd like them on the back.

1 year ago | 2  

@spinelldete

I use a RME Babyface for 15 years now. The layout is very practical: Instrument input and headphones on the side of the box, ADAT in/out and a D-Sub connection for everything else on the back with 20cm cables. Since I do not travel with this setup it is fine for me.

1 year ago | 0  

@djmidnightwolf

Depends on the interface. I like the ease of access of front but back can give a cleaner look and easier cable routing. On my Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 I primarily just use the front 2 and the back only if needed.

1 year ago | 0

@gyulamolnar8971

I chose to do it from the front, but I think it depends on how often you need to plug it in. Because it's easier to stick in the front than to bend behind. But if you don't plan on plugging in frequently, it's better in the back.

1 year ago | 0

@orryfishburne5326

I think it depends on how many inputs it has. If its a desktop unit that has 2 inputs then i prefer it on the front. 4 inputs on the back. Rack mount i like in the back with 2 up front.

1 year ago (edited) | 1

@gurmusic

On top

1 year ago | 1

@Moulk

Having a Scarlett 2i2, I thought I would buy a V4 to upgrade my setup, but as I record vocals and guitars on the fly, I usually plug and unplug my cables, so back connexions were a no for me.

1 year ago (edited) | 1  

@bgravato

Connections in the back, controls in front. I have Motu M2 and XLR connectors in front kind of hinders the access to the buttons and knobs. Also cables coming off in front over my desk is a nuisance. It would be neater if they'd go to the back and get out of the way. The only advantage of having them in front is that it would be more practical if I need to connect/disconnect them often... Which isn't the case in my typical use. In terms of designing the circuit board I understand that having inputs and outputs in opposite sides can probably be handy, but from an usability stand it wouldn't be my preference.

1 year ago | 0

@mitkothemacedonian

The back is for rackmount interfaces, or interfaces with more than two inputs, or interfaces with inputs expected to be connected via patchbay. If it is a two channel, desktop, handy, then I want to be able to plug something in without getting up or lifting it or rotating it.

1 year ago | 3  

@hwreviewers

Hi, my choice is back, but with a 4 channels interface i would like to see 2 xlr combo on front and 2 to back, this should be a good solution too. Better to have a nice and clean front with a good meter level display and affordable knobs.

1 year ago | 0  

@tporter23

I prefer my inputs to be in an interface that you have reviewed so I know I have a quality interface! Would love to see you review an RME interface someday to see just how it’s latency compares with others you’ve reviewed. Curious if the price increase is truly worth it.

1 year ago | 2

@achanonymous

A mix - two in the front for quick easy access should I need them, with the rest in the back for permanently wired in stuff.

1 year ago | 0