I'm okay with the nerfs as I don't enjoy playing it often anyways. What in really excited for is the buffs to the m4 54. I think they should give it more gold pen to like 300 or 306 and then it will be a fun tank. That 130 mm is gonna be good and I cant wait
3 years ago | 10
The fact that the kran will be a heavy after the nerf and not a slow medium is ok for me. There was a reason why all the people used it in ranked... now the vz-55 is in danger too lol Its just sad that its only the tech tree tanks that gets nerfed. Another blow to free to play players
3 years ago | 13
I think the way it was Hit is the issue. The one Thing that is the Most infuriating about the Kran is that there is No way to pen it, except for sniping a Pixel of cupola or overpeaking, which would result in you eating the entire Clip, because the kranvagns Reverse Speed is also insane. I Like the Changes to the reload time and manouverability. The other nerfs were Just Not needed in my honest oppinion. However the Main issue aka. Lack of weakspots was Not touched in the slightest. Acuracy Nerf is also Just..... Like I get it but that was certainely Not the issue
3 years ago | 45
best part of the nerf is the mobility now that i think about it, biggest problem was that Kran could get into positions too fast and safe
3 years ago | 2
I like the nerfs personally. Kranvagn always had way too good mobility, and nerfing that and the gun will balance out its super hulldown armor. If I had to choose I would pick mobility nerf over armor nerf, because if they decrease its turret armor too much the Kran will lose the only thing it's good for. Face Kran in any other situation and it is a very easy threat to deal with.
3 years ago | 16
Oh, doesn't surprise me one bit. Practically every line I begin to research is nerfed. I've been there before, so - shrug!!
3 years ago | 2
The unholy trinity of nerfs. Dpm dispersion and mobility jesus!!
3 years ago | 1
I think wargaming should balance all other tanks like buffing type 5, nerfing EBR , buffing maus, nerfing SPGs ,and the list goes on ... by doing that most players will be happy
3 years ago | 2
The problem is not with the nerf of Kranvagn, it's the NOT nerfing of other OP tanks - or the existence of OP tanks in general, in other words, the lack of balancing. Nerfing Kravagn, but not nerfing Vz55, and moreover, the OP reward/premium tanks like the Obj279e & the T95/FV4201 Chieftain, just means those OP tanks now are even more dominant. Now there are 1 less tank to compete with those OP tanks, one which is reasonably accessible to the F2P/ave/non-hardcore players... Just more imbalanced quick matches especially when one side have more of those OP tanks, guess that's what Wargaming wants anyways.
3 years ago | 22
If they should need anything it is Obj.907, Obj.279e, Obj.260 and Chieftain
3 years ago | 1
Kran needed tweaking but hitting this hard will make it suffer from the same issues as the tornvagn.
3 years ago | 5
I just stopped grinding kran and started t110e4 and soviat meds + Czechoslovakian heavies
3 years ago | 0
On one hand this one of the few tech tree tanks that can go toe-to-toe with OP tanks like chief or 279. On the other it is a pretty OP tank itself. They just should nerf its clip reload and intra-clip and be done with it.
3 years ago | 0
Kran needs a hitable weakspot at the turret. I dont know if a nerf of inraclip or the reload would be better. To mention is that 10 secs per shot reload should be good.
3 years ago | 0
I think kran balanced bit more and Nerf vz 55 gun handling a little bit it also great
3 years ago | 0
DezGamez
So... what do you think about Kranvagn nerf? Let me know in the comments "How would YOU rebalance Kranvagn"!
3 years ago | [YT] | 173