Yes, and “obviously” yes…. But not so obvious to many/most? When the obvious reaches critical mass, then we “begin” (a new and improved chapter)
1 week ago | 4
Especially at the moment, we are seeing a lot of arguments and conflict essentially boiling down to what language is being used. For me, when asked to explain reality, all I can say is “There it is”
1 week ago | 2
i understand one thing, money talks. If it would't, there i would be no youtube. Are we ever going to do something real, other than to repeat over and over the same thing - that there is nothing to talk about? Don't get me wrong, i love what you are doing. But - bring into it, what really does something positive, don't just talk around it. Stop feeding the egos of the seekers, tell them how to stop seeking.
1 week ago | 8
Jacque Fresco reached or brought new language as thought experience. In my humble opinion 🎉
1 week ago | 1
You know what the greatest problem in this world is, its delusion, your greatest enemy is the automatic mode of unaware sense making and living thereby in a deluded self.
1 week ago | 1
You could at least give Saussure and Peirce some credit. Half of your text discusses well-known theories, yet you don't attribute them properly.
1 week ago | 0
Essentia Foundation
Fredric Nord argues that knowing reality through language is fundamentally and inescapably a misunderstanding of reality. We misunderstand what language actually does and, thereby, misunderstand what life is. The key to understanding life is, he argues, a reframing of language and representation. This should end the paradigm of materialism and facilitate transcendence as a priori.
www.essentiafoundation.org/not-even-language-is-a-…
1 week ago | [YT] | 167