If you do Feodra you should cover the silver blue variant it's been my main distro especially with the expiremental feature that lets you not have it reboot so it feels good, especially someone that wants a 'just works' distro
3 years ago (edited) | 5
I have always shied away from Fedora. I tried it on several occasions. The last time I did was in 2014. I've always thought the large Icons and clunky actions based os was ugly. Not only that, but I could never get Java or Cups to work properly. However, I decided to switch recently after years of using some sort of "Buntu" or Manjaro running XFCE. I got bored. Now I must say that I'm impressed. The icons do look much better. Everything I need just works and the dark theme addition really makes the overall look and feel quite polished and modern. A deep dive into Fedora is much appreciated as I plan on becoming a power user.
3 years ago | 1
I suggest Linux Lite, openSUSE Tumbleweed, and Garuda Linux. You could review the latter in the same video as the one you plan to do on EndeavourOS, as they're both highly-regarded Arch-based distros.
3 years ago | 5
I feel like you should probably pick the least-voted distro to highlight solely based on the fact that its lack of popularity means it deserves the spotlight.
3 years ago | 11
I think you can do a video detailing what best unique things Linux Mint & Zorin did respectively for new users, where one fails where the other one shines and what can be done to improve each of these.
3 years ago | 0
MX is criminally underrepresented on youtube. Probably because it#s so unexciting. But I recently ended my distrohopping phase after several months of trying almost 50 different ones, including some really exotic distros. And MX is much likely the one I'll be settling for. Gave me the least problems when installing, is not locked down and granny-safe as, like Zorin for example. Helps with installing drivers and essentials and feels like the best alternative for a windows power user right now. Pop OS for example had massive quality management problems. Fedora KDE didn't even install properly. MX seems really mature. But maybe that's boring. Still not sure whether going KDE or XFCE though. KDE customization is a bit intimidating.
3 years ago | 0
Why does Zorin Lite have so few votes ? If they actually managed to port all their layouts to XFCE (including the GNOME one, apparently), it would be super interesting to highlight
3 years ago | 0
- We know that Linux Mint is going to be solid. It always is. - We know that Fedora users Vanilla GNOME and GNOME had become a frustrating laughing stock. - I think Pop_Os should be further explored
3 years ago | 1
I'm now using manjaro cinnamon and it blows everything else out the water. Its beautiful but not to everyone's taste. Mx Linux looks good as does the upcoming mint 20.3.There are just so many to choose from
3 years ago | 0
InfinitelyGalactic
Which distro deserves a deeper dive? - btw...Distro Digest ep 2 is dropping very soon to catch you up on what you (but mostly I) have missed.
3 years ago | [YT] | 68