Are you tired of listening to health podcasts and not knowing if the guest is talking real data driven perspective or if they're pulling BS out of their rear-end?
I am. I've stopped listening to podcasts, because I'm getting frustrated listening. Or, at least, I stopped listening until now...
I'm starting a new show on the channel - it's called 'The Centrifuge', where we spin out the BS from the science (lab nerds will especially appreciate the name, I think). Essentially, I'm going to go through the majority of popular podcast episodes (Attia, Huberman, Jay Shetty, Mel Robbins, you name it), and across multiple episodes, I will dissect the claims - both wild and fair - and add scientific references, context, and application to the words uttered. No more guesswork.
The episodes will *not* interfere or replace any of the other original videos I release - they are 'in addition to' the regular scheduled programming. This is a trial run, but I feel passionate about this, because: I'm tired of the pseudoscientific BS. So, we'll see if it sticks around (it takes me weeks of work for each podcast episode), but I do think it'll help you identify what claims have at least some scientific basis and which do not.
I've recorded 3 episodes already - the first episode releases THIS SATURDAY (12/13) and begins with a two part on a prominent doctor. I'm excited - I hope it helps!
(Also, tomorrow's video is going to be a sweet one... pun intended.)
Physionic
Are you tired of this, too?
Are you tired of listening to health podcasts and not knowing if the guest is talking real data driven perspective or if they're pulling BS out of their rear-end?
I am. I've stopped listening to podcasts, because I'm getting frustrated listening. Or, at least, I stopped listening until now...
I'm starting a new show on the channel - it's called 'The Centrifuge', where we spin out the BS from the science (lab nerds will especially appreciate the name, I think). Essentially, I'm going to go through the majority of popular podcast episodes (Attia, Huberman, Jay Shetty, Mel Robbins, you name it), and across multiple episodes, I will dissect the claims - both wild and fair - and add scientific references, context, and application to the words uttered. No more guesswork.
The episodes will *not* interfere or replace any of the other original videos I release - they are 'in addition to' the regular scheduled programming. This is a trial run, but I feel passionate about this, because: I'm tired of the pseudoscientific BS. So, we'll see if it sticks around (it takes me weeks of work for each podcast episode), but I do think it'll help you identify what claims have at least some scientific basis and which do not.
I've recorded 3 episodes already - the first episode releases THIS SATURDAY (12/13) and begins with a two part on a prominent doctor. I'm excited - I hope it helps!
(Also, tomorrow's video is going to be a sweet one... pun intended.)
Nic
1 week ago | [YT] | 1,440