If they remastered new Vegas I would want them to bring back a lot of the cut content, there is so much for NV
3 months ago | 83
New Vegas doesn’t need the remaster as much as Fallout 3 does to be honest. I played through Fallout 3 and all of it’s DLCs once and I really just haven’t felt a pull to do it again. Some things that could be added: -Make power armor feel like Titans of the New West -Add in some perks/traits/weapons from New Vegas. Energy and Unarmed weapons especially -Quality of life additions like local/world maps for the dlcs -Iron sights -Give Unique weapons custom textures/models -Some of, but not all of, Fallout 4/76’s crafting/modding system. It’d be cool being able to add stuff like a hair-trigger or reflex sights but not to the extent to where theres like 30 versions of the same mod that are slightly better than the previous version. -For the love of God, keep Fallout 3’s aesthetic in-tact. The weapon/armor/architecture/item design is really good, it just needs to be enhanced with modern graphical capabilities. Please please PLEASE do not use the Fallout 4 cartoon artstyle or the boring ass redesigns. Fallout 3’s industrial, horror-inspired and bleak look is so iconic and adding high contrast colors and shit all over the place will completely ruin the tone.
3 months ago (edited) | 2
Leave new vegas alone, doing a remaster would just hurt people that loved that game knowing it would be mishandled and censored
3 months ago (edited)
| 33
If they remastered FNV imagine how much things would be censored
3 months ago
| 33
We don’t need a FNV remaster it’s literally been perfected through mods. Remasters are money grabs aimed at console players.
3 months ago
| 17
FNV fans: Fallout New Vegas is perfect!!! It doesn’t need any improvements. Also FNV fans: Fallout New Vegas DESPERATELY needs a remaster 🥺
3 months ago | 2
Imagine wanting to replay a game you have already played and is still fully playable over a new experience, even if a fallout 5 would probably be disappointing
3 months ago | 27
If i were given the choice between a sequel to New Vegas or a Remaster, id definetly go for remaster: A New Vegas sequel would flop with a 85-90% certainty. New Vegas, despite appearances, was ground breaking in roleplaying games which is only the first part of the achievment; the second part being it was made in 18 months. I highly doubt they can best FNV's standards even with todays equipment...
3 months ago
| 6
If they remaster it, they'll probably change things like they did inMass Effectt we can just mod it
3 months ago
| 1
Both would be mishandled greatly so it's like choosing which foot to be shot in
3 months ago
| 18
Would love a remake of the classic games. I had a dream about a fallout 2 remake one time.
3 months ago | 0
New vegas remaster with the newer combat system. Original NV was clunky as hell
3 months ago
| 6
Todd: "Holy shit they actually want me to sell them the same games again."
3 months ago (edited) | 0
Chad Nobark
What would you rather see?
3 months ago | [YT] | 168