More specifically, the insipid comments about topics they know nothing about nor do they bother to read. Every time I read a news article that's fucking dumb enough to allow people to post a comment, all ya see is page after page of people who read the headline only and decided to write out a whole rant based on the one sentence they actually read. More often than not, when a few people read the comments, they have to reply: “Hey, taint licker! You didn't read the whole article, and every complaint, loophole, or technicality you feel the need to bitch about has been resolved in said article! Spend less time trying to blow yourself and finish reading the story! Then, you can write a response! PS, your mom fucking hates you!” As a rule, one should not start posting comments based on a knee-jerk reaction to a headline. For example: “Newsflash! Mimes Destroy Conceptual Art!”
“How dare you say mimes destroy conceptual art! Being a mime takes a particular set of skills that the writer of this article clearly doesn't understand. His inability to grasp the subtle nuances of the mime arts makes him an ignorant man and thus renders his opinions moot on the topic.”
Of course, the shithead didn't finish reading the article, which was really about a group of mimes who have raided a modern art museum and destroyed a conceptual art installation. So now we all have to sift through thirty goddamn pages of unwarranted anger just to find the one comment that would add insight to the story. And that rarely happens. Just cuz you can post, doesn't mean you should. Think before you write. Read the article entirely, and then take the time to formulate an informed response. Read. Write. Post. In that order. Nothing else. Otherwise, your words equate to nothing but mostly prime-cut free-range Grade-B bullshit.
Nathan Aponte
You Know What's Bullshit?! Comments
More specifically, the insipid comments about topics they know nothing about nor do they bother to read. Every time I read a news article that's fucking dumb enough to allow people to post a comment, all ya see is page after page of people who read the headline only and decided to write out a whole rant based on the one sentence they actually read. More often than not, when a few people read the comments, they have to reply: “Hey, taint licker! You didn't read the whole article, and every complaint, loophole, or technicality you feel the need to bitch about has been resolved in said article! Spend less time trying to blow yourself and finish reading the story! Then, you can write a response! PS, your mom fucking hates you!” As a rule, one should not start posting comments based on a knee-jerk reaction to a headline. For example: “Newsflash! Mimes Destroy Conceptual Art!”
“How dare you say mimes destroy conceptual art! Being a mime takes a particular set of skills that the writer of this article clearly doesn't understand. His inability to grasp the subtle nuances of the mime arts makes him an ignorant man and thus renders his opinions moot on the topic.”
Of course, the shithead didn't finish reading the article, which was really about a group of mimes who have raided a modern art museum and destroyed a conceptual art installation. So now we all have to sift through thirty goddamn pages of unwarranted anger just to find the one comment that would add insight to the story. And that rarely happens. Just cuz you can post, doesn't mean you should. Think before you write. Read the article entirely, and then take the time to formulate an informed response. Read. Write. Post. In that order. Nothing else. Otherwise, your words equate to nothing but mostly prime-cut free-range Grade-B bullshit.
2 years ago (edited) | [YT] | 1