Your research into this is the main reason I subscribe to your content. Your timeline is so logical and obvious that it's comforting and relaxing to finally know the truth. THANK YOU
2 months ago | 4
@nathanh83 What year does this push creation to? I believe that according to the dead sea scrolls calendar we are in year 5950, the last jubelee cycle before the messianic millennial reign. Meaning by that time Jesus will have already set himself up on earth. Also have you looked into apparent contradictions of Stephen's sermon in acts? I'm wondering is any would resolve with different genealogical dates
1 month ago | 1
It is indeed concerning the amount of influence the Masoretes have over Bible translations, and how many are at the mercy of those translators.
2 months ago | 0
CMI and what video did he comment on? I was terribly sad to see the chart he made is sold, like there is only one copy? He could pay off his mortgage if he made it widely available! I tried building the same kind of chart but could not put in the time. I would love to see his.
1 week ago | 0
I don't believe they used THE Septuagint. They learned and memorized from a Hebrew copy that was closer to the LXX than it was to the MS in translational accuracy.
2 months ago | 0
I’m not sure that partnering with eastern orthodox believers is a feather in the cap of legitimacy? Don’t they recognize the Eucharist as doctrine and the wafer and wine as the actual body and blood of Jesus Christ?
2 months ago | 0
Genesis 5 & 11 are the only places that people actually care about in Codex Vaticanus other than The New Testament. The irony is, every single scholar knows that you cannot use the Greek Old Testament to make a complete chronology. There are centuries missing from the rest of The Tanakh. Odd that they should be more accurate in the more distant past and so sinister in the recent past. Especially if it’s a BC document, distorting history some alive witnessed. I will stick with The Red Letters of Matthew 5:17-18 that God’s Pure Word was recorded with vowel points, or tittles. Follow Jesus, John 3:12!
2 months ago | 0
NathanH83
This is encouraging. Someone left a comment on CMI's youtube video, in response to me, about a timeline chart that he had made, which is for sale on eBay.
This is what he said:
-------
I agree with Nathan. I have done a detailed time-proportional chart comparing chronologies between the LXX and MT. This chart also integrates a comparison of Dr. David Rohl's new pharonic dating with the convention chronology. This dating fits with the Patterns of Evidence series. There are about 1500 additional years in the Septuagint chronology than in the Masoretic Leningrad Codex chronology. It is highly suspect that Noah's son Shem lived until the time of Abraham as Bible teachers expound using the Masoretic-based text. This disapears in the LXX-based chronology. Despite all the scholars who want to find fault with the Septuagint and its variants, the Apostle Paul, Josephus, the Samaritans and even the incarnate Lord nevertheless used the Septuagint. Today Eastern Orthodox churches still use the Septuagint. The chart I have produced took many hours to create and is available to the seriously interested on Ebay:
"Septuagint vs. Masoretic-based Ages Comparison Proportional Chart & Chronology":
ebay.us/m/JsXPxc
I belive the proportional chart with its supplemental information should convince any reasonable person that the Septuagint translated from the Hebrew Scriptures about 600 years before the Masoretic Leningrad Codex was created is more true to the original autographs and is definitely more consistent with extra Biblical information.
-------
2 months ago | [YT] | 23