Michael Beverly

This insane lying gas-lighting evil bigot has blocked me so I cannot comment on this video like this: hahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhha
Melissa actually thinks she's a "critical thinker" and that people who "fall for cults" are not using "critical thinking."
People, you cannot make this sh*t up.
NOTE: Alisa's faith was saved by J. Warner Wallace's book Cold Case, which even conservative Christian scholars mock as total rubbish.
So you've got brain-dead idiots pretending that believing a former cop has proved the resurrection is "intellectual."
No, seriously, you couldn't invent this level of idiocy if you tried.
Remember, Melissa converted in 24 hours at 17 years old. As a teenager, she "knew" the "Truth."

4 months ago | [YT] | 13



@HuertaGabrielJose

The funniest part about this is, Michaels name is Hebrew for "Who is Like God" The more he rage baits Christians, the more he's proving God lives in His head rent free. The irony 😭😭😭😭😭😂😂 lolll God is Good, He will not be

1 month ago (edited) | 2

@computationaltheist7267

You've made the below argument before so I hope that you will address it here: As to slevary, gRape, SA, and theft, we can find a foundation for an objective ethic. For example, by definition, you cannot want to be gRaped, it's impossible, for if you want what is to be done, it's not gRape, again, by definition. So, since it's universal, i.e. nobody can want to or desire to be gRaped (not talking about sex role playing, which only mimics this) then we can say it's a good foundation because universally and without exception, no human being wants it to happen to them. So objectively, since nobody wants this, we can saw it's unethical, it goes against everyone's desire for themselves. The problem with your argument assumes that universal rejection of an act proves it is objectively unethical. But just because everyone subjectively dislikes something doesn't automatically make it objectively wrong. Objective morality should hold true regardless of individual feelings. What if 90% of people enjoyed something harmful to the remaining 10%—would that make it moral? Not necessarily. So while the universal rejection of rape is morally powerful, it’s not a logical proof of objectivity; it’s a strong consensus, which isn't quite the same. In fact, your answer doesn't even apply to slevary. Read David Graeber's book on slevary where Africans sold themselves into slevary. to keep their assets from being taken away. Right away, your argument that nobody wants to be sold into slevary falls flat when you study history, which is ironic given how you blast Christian apologists for not reading history. So we're back into the old question? Human beings for centuries thought slevary is evil. In fact, even during the Enlightenment, they were debating whether it was immoral before joining the abolitionists, so clearly, the amount of education didn't help, did it, Beverly? Don't forget: If someone genuinely wants to be treated badly (say, a masochist), does that make it moral for others to oblige? Let's apply the Euthyphro Dilemma: 1) Are things wrong because we hate them? 2) Or do we hate them because they’re already wrong? 3) If it’s the first, then morality is subjective (based on human feelings). 4) If it’s the second, then we still need a deeper reason for why it’s wrong: beyond just dislike.

4 months ago (edited) | 3

@samppakoivula9977

Yeah, Melissa who mocks everything she can get her hands on, yet not implementing the same things on christianity because it is not "a cult" and can not have cult-like tendencies. Goes to the text book definition of being a hypocrite. Plus, no matter what you may think about new age, she is ashamed of her past, but now she is saved and holy christian - yet she mocks new age in every turn she can, which is a clear psychological indicator that she is not over her past! But, there are a lot worse people than Melissa, like pretty much any televangelist + Ray Comfort. Okay, televangelists are good material for mocking also, like Kenneth Copeland and the "music videos" made from his "sermons" or Joel Osteen, because even christians don't like him for various reasons...

4 months ago | 2  

@Thedottedhalfnote-ui1wj

What conservative scholars don’t agree with his book?

3 months ago | 0

@JohnLovellJr

lol

4 months ago | 2