And today, I have several black friends who won't go to a doctor because of this. They simply do not trust the medical community and who can blame them?
1 week ago | 13
A lot of people don't know that the Tuskegee Study was a follow-up to a similar study done in Scandinavia on white men. The point of Tuskegee study was to see the effects of syphilis on black men and note any differences there might be.
1 week ago | 5
I believe Canada was doing something similar to indigenous children. They were intentionally underfeeding them to learn about the effects of malnourishment.
1 week ago | 8
Cruelty and treating others in an inhumane way is despicable in an individual; in a systemic, targeted approach by a governing body it is reprehensible and inexcusable beyond any comprehension. 💔
1 week ago | 0
Your Post, just gave me 100 wins for quizzes on YouTube! Thank You!
6 days ago (edited) | 1
Milgram and Stanford Prison Experiment are the same thing just done different ways. They were to see how far people would go in positions of power, positions of submission, positions of having to dish out punishments at the behest of others, peer pressure, authority figures and justice and injustice. It all comes down to people using power to abuse others for whatever justified purpose it serves in the perpetrators head. As for the Monster Study I'm not even going to get into how fucking cruel that was to children and how it likely created potential life long abusers, serial killers, etc, in the victims the study was commit.
1 week ago | 0
That's why some researchers find ways to do Meta-studies and set up others in places with no or relaxed IRB's. OTOH, if one does studies on government agents who've acted as criminals but claimed immunity, doesn't that make them virtual legal fictions and not actual humans, at least in that capacity lawyering insanity does double talk around? If so, lawyers, politicians, and cops should be freely available for studies found unethical or illegal on actual "born persons", right? For inmates, US ConLaw bans cruel OR unusual punishments. Given the SCOTUS absurdities over a missing Oxford comma, it must then be legal to use inmates in ways that are instead cruel AND unusual, right? IRB games can be teacherous. I knew someone who wanted to study adverse outcomes in an ER that seemed to have problems, but the head doctor there headed that school's IRB. The person who suspected he caused most of the adverse outcomes convinced a business admin to set new procedures to collect the info needed for the study for business purposes, and then he designed a meta-study of that, but also found a way to start a second IRB with an overlapping but different nominal focus. And showed the ER head needed to be fired. People competent to play those games can be incredibly treacherous. Some even have socially beneficial goals.
1 week ago | 1
So disappointing what humans do to others. Sadly it's not just one place or one people. I remember hearing about experiments some countries did on other countries citizens. Like.... humans are truly the worst animals on earth.
1 week ago | 0
I missed that one in history class i must've had a tummy ache that day 🤔🤷
1 week ago | 0
And people wonder why we don't trust the science that the gov't tells us to. The covax was a massive human trial experimental study as well. I can't believe how many did it, knowing that they conduct human experiments like this.
1 week ago | 1
List 25
Which unethical experiment involved observing untreated syphilis in hundreds of men without their knowledge for decades?
(For more facts like this, check out our new video 👉https://youtu.be/niQ_tSNrLYg)
1 week ago | [YT] | 437