No human would do the job so they just pushed it off onto a crappy AI program. Sounds like corporate America to me.
1 month ago | 4
Keep asking if they have seen or viewed the images. If the images were not viewed, I would argue that the "decision" was arbitrary and capricious.
1 month ago | 0
My suggestion is a viewer flagged you. A spiteful person did you wrong...probably for Sexual Content, which in a negative person's eyes could be anything to do with adult humanity. Male in this thought process could be considered sexual, because you are discussing one of the sexes...
1 month ago | 0
Friend of Dorothy's
Spent two hours with the utterly useless "help" option which is clearly just an AI chatbot. The "agent" states they will help me, put me on hold then comes back to say they can't view videos that were already decided on. What's the purpose of the help option if you can't challenge an appeal decision that's clearly incorrect? How does the YT system flag a video for nudity if it contains none and it's confirmed on appeal within 30 seconds of the appeal being submitted? There's no way a human being reviewed the video being appealed within 30 seconds of me pressing "appeal".
And the chatbot AI is convinced they are human! The Help chatbot uses generic responses and doesn't simply answer my basic question: "Did you take a second look at the video like you promised?" Instead it talks around the issue in circles; telling me "It seems your video was removed for violating the nudity policy". When asked if it's a chatbot, the "agent" insists that it's human, but keeps offering generic answers without addressing my questions!
So frustrating!
1 month ago | [YT] | 70