Wanting no more dogs is not about cruelty to animals. It's about human welfare and public health as well as animal welfare (animals that are not dogs would benefit from their absence, as would we).
As we know - and as was recently pointed out - it used to be the case that a dog which drew blood was quickly put down. I wish society would realize collectively that dogs, as long as they're around us, will just keep biting because that's what TF they do. The track record shows that attacks by them don't ever stop, and many are fatal or life-altering.
Perhaps more than anything, I wish it wasn't controversial to say all of this. That it wasn't controversial to understand and explain that it'd be best for us to take a proactive approach and put them all down in advance (before they can bite anyone) until there are no more dog bites or maulings.
Dog worshippers will hate this 'cuz it means no more beasts for them to be nasty or vicious with, or to have as socially acceptable living teddy bears - and bc they don't care about people getting injured or inconvenienced by the existence of dogs.
But they'd be VERY hard-pressed to argue that there is any more effective solution to the slew of issues created by their existence, than NO MORE DOGS AROUND. In fact it'd be impossible for them to make such a case.
K-None Official
Wanting no more dogs is not about cruelty to animals. It's about human welfare and public health as well as animal welfare (animals that are not dogs would benefit from their absence, as would we).
As we know - and as was recently pointed out - it used to be the case that a dog which drew blood was quickly put down. I wish society would realize collectively that dogs, as long as they're around us, will just keep biting because that's what TF they do. The track record shows that attacks by them don't ever stop, and many are fatal or life-altering.
Perhaps more than anything, I wish it wasn't controversial to say all of this. That it wasn't controversial to understand and explain that it'd be best for us to take a proactive approach and put them all down in advance (before they can bite anyone) until there are no more dog bites or maulings.
Dog worshippers will hate this 'cuz it means no more beasts for them to be nasty or vicious with, or to have as socially acceptable living teddy bears - and bc they don't care about people getting injured or inconvenienced by the existence of dogs.
But they'd be VERY hard-pressed to argue that there is any more effective solution to the slew of issues created by their existence, than NO MORE DOGS AROUND. In fact it'd be impossible for them to make such a case.
4 days ago (edited) | [YT] | 85