I just read today about a new disease in dogs bitten by infected ticks that may soon spread to humans. These mutts carry so many diseases, and they're a constant risk of diseases in humans that doctors won't know about. That's scary. Imagine getting disabled or dying, not knowing how you got sick and no one knowing how to treat it, because people want dogs everywhere. We didn't consent to dog exposure, but I'm sure nobody in the high paying roles will go against dog worship because they're making money off the human damage.
4 days ago
| 18
Why wouldn't any sensible person hate the most violent, problematic, and disease riddled pet animal?
4 days ago
| 12
Removing all humans would be a disaster for the Earth. We maintain a lot of species unironically and without us, a lot of disasters would happen. Don't forget animal rescue efforts are done by humans not dogs. Removing dogs wouldn't have a single effect on society or even Earth. True, dog nutters would cry but everything will move on. Plus, a lot of rabies case would go down a lot and stop dog attacks for good. I have a fox as my profile picture and it sucks that foxes are considered "vermins" more than dogs. Foxes get killed everyday for sport or their fur. We have materials that basically make fur coats useless. And yet, they say it's still necessary. No, I don't want a fox as a pet. I respect them and that's it. Foxes avoid humans too. Dogs cling on to you for food and contaminate everything.
4 days ago
| 8
But what you're saying is so strange you want entire species of dogs to disappear including g dogs that have never seen a person. You want them all to go poof gone and that a large dose of delusion
3 days ago | 2
K-None Official
Wanting no more dogs is not about cruelty to animals. It's about human welfare and public health as well as animal welfare (animals that are not dogs would benefit from their absence, as would we).
As we know - and as was recently pointed out - it used to be the case that a dog which drew blood was quickly put down. I wish society would realize collectively that dogs, as long as they're around us, will just keep biting because that's what TF they do. The track record shows that attacks by them don't ever stop, and many are fatal or life-altering.
Perhaps more than anything, I wish it wasn't controversial to say all of this. That it wasn't controversial to understand and explain that it'd be best for us to take a proactive approach and put them all down in advance (before they can bite anyone) until there are no more dog bites or maulings.
Dog worshippers will hate this 'cuz it means no more beasts for them to be nasty or vicious with, or to have as socially acceptable living teddy bears - and bc they don't care about people getting injured or inconvenienced by the existence of dogs.
But they'd be VERY hard-pressed to argue that there is any more effective solution to the slew of issues created by their existence, than NO MORE DOGS AROUND. In fact it'd be impossible for them to make such a case.
4 days ago (edited) | [YT] | 86