I can almost guarantee that 95% of the people who voted 2 did it because it very obviously looks less expensive and so it must be the most expensive for some "interesting reason". And I'm not just saying that because that's exactly what my brain did.
1 year ago | 70
2 looks terrible...so terrible it HAS to be 1.... so I feel like it's a trick and it's 2.
1 year ago (edited) | 204
With roe and what looks like mussel shells along with presentation, I guess #1.
1 year ago | 20
The first dish looks like food to actually eat. The second looks like a pretentious art piece. It's 2.
1 year ago | 11
One has what looks like salmon roe, so it has to be 1. The second one looks gross, so I’d be shocked if it was over $500 of ingredients lol
1 year ago | 5
I know food prices have gone up but there is no blinkin way I’m spending $500 on a salmon dinner, not even helicopter out first day of the copper river salmon run.
1 year ago (edited) | 2
Dish 1: High quality ingredients, plated like a level 2 chef Dish 3: Lower quality ingredients, plated like a level 3 chef
1 year ago | 0
I have watched enough of food shows to know its second. I don't know how they always create something unappetizing with expensive budget.
1 year ago | 0
Rich people food always comes in tiny, disappointing portion sizes; it has to be 2.
1 year ago | 0
Epicurious
Can you guess which of these salmon dishes cost $513 to make? You can check out each recipe and see whether you were right here: https://youtu.be/0NZfsHqLqe8
1 year ago | [YT] | 258