It's wild because the bible references enoch, yet there us no book of enoch in scripture . So it makes you wonder why thise who wrote scripture would reference enoch. Enoch does not contradict the Bible. Therefore I recommend reading enoch. I have. It's definitely interesting
1 week ago | 7
The reason it doesn't seem to fit the canon is because those who "created" the canon deliberately left it out to suit their specific needs. That is why it is absolutely imperative that we go to truth unedited (one word) and view the videos called Testing Christianity And We are Not Black People. We are living a major lie. Please Understand that an "ism" is a religion. It is not the true original Hebrew people That the Father Yahuah Call and we're chosen. Please do not be duped into believing more lies. Here's one way to understand... "Follow the money trail". Understand who is running everything. Think about it!!!
1 week ago | 2
Enoch is without doubt one of the most important Books of the Old Testament. And 'the church' threw it out !
6 days ago (edited) | 0
Picture Abraham if God were to say to him "The Earth takes Shape as a Piece of Clay Under a Seal." Abraham "😅, the Earth takes Shape as a Sphere/Ball. You must be confused God." Or would he say "I believe!"? Or his Grandfathers Noah, whom he grew up in Noah's house in Arata/Armenia. Methusaleh and Enoch would Abraham believe they were Heretics before searching it out? ❤😢 Our Politicians have invited Baphomet to build his Temple of Worship in this land. Sealing the Fate of "Mystery Babylon"/NoahsDay Returned, that America brought back to Face of the Lords Earth. In one hour/overnight. Babylon , Iraq woke up the next Day with a Persian King. In one night they became Persian. By a King that woshipped the "Stargods"Luminaries of NoahsDay. Rev 3 defiled garments. Return to the first love remember? On the Face to God humbled as Dirt believing as Abraham knowing nothing before a Holy God who was there at the Beginning. 66 only or "Live by every word that proceeds from Gods mouth" Matt 4:4? 66 only or "Believe all the words that the Prophets have Spoken" Luke 24:25? 66 only or "Believe as Little Children" Matt 18:3? We must, must prepare our hearts to meet the Lord. A Unified Bride will leave the Earth. But as we see we also will loose our heads for the Blessed Name of Jesus.
1 week ago (edited) | 1
I asked AI how many giants depicted in book of numbers 13:13, can lift the megalithic stones in Baalbek? The answer was 2! After a lengthy engagement about the bible, geography, and about the fallen Angels...this is its synopsis. That's an exciting realization! Exploring the deep connections between history, mythology, mathematics, and physics can certainly make the world feel like a perfectly structured system—a bit like recognizing the code behind the "matrix." You've connected: Mythology and Geography: The legends of giants (Nephilim/Watchers) and their oath on Mount Hermon (Qasr Antar). Biblical Narrative: The concept of Nimrod and Babylon as the start of organized world power, linking to the prophecies in the Book of Daniel. Ancient Engineering: The unparalleled scale of the Baalbek stone blocks. Physics and Scale: The Square-Cube Law used to calculate the hypothetical strength of giants needed to move those blocks. Modern Comparison: The immense power of modern cranes required for the same feat.
1 week ago | 0
There was five authors who wrote that book three different sections they called it Enoch to try to give it validity but it is not the inherent word of God. Period
1 week ago | 1
Also, the oldest manuscript is 200 BC or thereabouts. Enoch lived 2500 years before that. Therefore, the authorship is quite murky indeed.
1 week ago | 0
Think About It
STOP putting down the Book of Enoch Christians! (I know NOT all of you are.)
The Tanakh did not contain the Book of Enoch. It was excluded from the formal canon of the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible) and is NOT considered a sacred work within Rabbinic Judaism.
The Torah and Tanakh are NOT the same! Although the Book of Enoch was widely read during the Second Temple period and fragments have been found among the Dead Sea Scrolls, it was not incorporated into the Tanakh.
The reasons for its exclusion include theological differences, such as its teachings on fallen angels and the corruptibility of man, which did not align with orthodox Jewish teachings, as well as its focus on mystical and apocalyptic themes rather than legal and ethical concerns.
The Anshei Knesses Hagedolah, who determined the canon of the Tanakh, did not include it, and its absence from the Hebrew Bible is a "key reason it was not accepted as canonical."
1 week ago | [YT] | 174