Tony & Chelsea Northrup

Quick! The sexy & small Sony a7C full-frame mirrorless camera is only $1299 (body only) or $1599 (with a lens) at SDP.io/a7Csale

6 months ago | [YT] | 216



@-AtomsPhere-

I want the A7Cii for that price haha

6 months ago | 19

@bwest6275

Out of stock 🫤 so I ended up getting the Leica Q3 43 instead

6 months ago | 3

@DMW5533

This would be great for just a walk around camera instead of carrying a Z6ii and a couple lenses where is the video review at that price i would by two

6 months ago | 0

@kingghidorah8106

my go to camera if it had two focal plane curtains instead of one

6 months ago | 0

@photographerimages

Canon R5 is heavier, but…

6 months ago | 0

@rosieokelly

"Only"

6 months ago | 7

@thomasdingwall4480

Sonys have gotten pretty chunky tho, remember how thin the first a7 was?

6 months ago | 0

@manuelight

too expensive for what it is imo

6 months ago | 12

@ilanhoward

Why try to get some $ from affiliate links on a camera you did not give a good review of?

6 months ago (edited) | 1

@dumptonpark

Looks similar to Niko zfc

6 months ago | 0

@alejandroortiz4565

Great i Buy one recently

6 months ago | 1

@JamesBurton-l3o

Tony or Chelsea , if you want I would trade you my a7riii for an a7c😅

6 months ago | 0

@valdemarjrgensen8072

I like the aesthetic, but it does also look like it has terrible ergonomics

6 months ago | 0

@Bugside

So classy looking, but that price

6 months ago | 1

@GripFreak

You made yourself look incompetent by advertising this camera. All about the money. Shameful...

6 months ago | 0

@jameschetwynd

I get great pictures Nikon coolpix p510 under $300 optical zoom 42x. 24-1000 rated

6 months ago | 0

@MrQwertypoiuyty

For that price, you can get the S9. Of course, the S9 camera doesn't have EVF, mechanical shutter, and weather sealing with a plastic build. But everything else is objectively better with the S9.

6 months ago | 0

@ypelimburg5865

Whatever "sexy" means here, it's nothing usefull.

6 months ago | 1