I mean, they called it “Pro” for a reason. That still leaves room for Apple Vision” and “Apple Vision Air”
1 year ago | 77
I think they should allow multiple logins which will justify this to exist in a household. Currently you’re paying $3500 for a device that only 1 person could use.
1 year ago | 14
I’m fine with a VR headset that is tethered to my iPhone so long as the headset is reasonably priced.
1 year ago | 0
It’s a really good idea, have it as a satellite device to the phone like the watch it, but also let us connect it to a Mac to work as a second monitor (or even as a sole monitor)
1 year ago | 10
I’d consider this if it could plug into either iPhone, iPad or Mac. $1,000 to $1,500 works for me.
1 year ago | 0
Come on Tim…. Where’s the folding phone? It’s ‘bout time now….
1 year ago | 0
I think apple should make glasses like what meta announced that are tethered to the iPhone and Apple watch initially. And they should be called "iGlass" or "iWear"
1 year ago | 1
Existing vision pro is Expensive and automatically glass breaking...... Hope that would not carry on in next vision device
1 year ago | 0
Sure, I'd rather have a puck where all the computing power is done, and it's funny because Apple is currently doing that with visionOS 2.2 with the widescreen. I think that's the right direction. And give people a vision display instead of an in-body computer.
1 year ago | 0
MacRumors
$3500 may have been too much! Would you get a cheaper iPhone tethered version of Vision Pro Apple is considering?
1 year ago | [YT] | 519