Where can I find this information? And do any of the other books say the same thing or is it just luke?
5 days ago | 1
It wasn't an inn More than likely, homes back in that time span would have had guest rooms to rent out for the night to people. Over the centuries, they created Inns, motels,hotels etc. The OGs of "you can use the spare bedroom." 😊
3 days ago | 0
I love that YouTube shows the correct answer (in green box with a BOLD check beside it) And yet people are giving the answers that were wrong in the comments 🤔 like that was the actual answer .... mind boggling for sur
3 days ago | 0
Where Jesus's was born was like a type of basement, it wasn't outside. They've shown it many times.😊
4 days ago | 0
You have to watch the true story of Joseph and Mary and you get the correct answer. Amen🙏
4 days ago | 0
How dare you attack the King James Bible and say it's historically incorrect. You will have to answer for this at the judgement seat of Christ. There are no errors in the King James Bible period. That's an unsubscribe for me
3 days ago | 0
The Christian Channel
🔴 The common translation of Luke 2:7 says there was “no room in the inn” where Jesus was born. Why is this translation historically incorrect and how does it completely change our understanding of the birth?
5 days ago | [YT] | 97