Corey Gil-Shuster

I am thinking of changing the logo. What do you think?
Which is better?
Other options? Tweaks to either of these?

1 month ago | [YT] | 72



@Ldw122

I truely like inclusion of the map. However, I think the second option might give people the impression that you’re making a statement regarding a one-state solution

1 month ago | 61

@MateoMPM

The second it's too political In order to remain as unbiased as possible Avoid the map

1 month ago | 53

@willhelterbrand3785

I prefer the bottom one but I personally would skip the map

1 month ago | 50

@ViviCoderGirl

I like you having something that indicates what your channels about. Without it its hard to let new users know wha you’re all about

1 month ago | 3

@haseo9124

Create borabora logo 😄

1 month ago | 2

@spacecat942

Either the first one or the second one without the map. The font on the second nice looks more "modern" and the first one looks more retro (both are a vibe) Edit: and another disadvantage to the map is the color. I don't know, the mix of mint and red makes me think it's a hospital project;0

1 month ago (edited) | 20

@Bob-tr3lo

No Map! Sometimes, the majority is WRONG!!!!

1 month ago | 1

@abdullahcala

I prefer to not include the Golan

1 month ago | 13

@BlueBedouin

The first one. The second one is too political.

1 month ago | 20

@asal_279

The first logo. Emotions on both sides would overpower any meaning behind the second logo, which would be counterproductive and run in stark contrast to the overall goals of The Ask Project. If the second is favored, I’d incorporate Israel in a manner other than a large complimentary color that makes it stand out (the current color is an extremely poor choice as it is, as even that negates the centrist, non-biased stance TAP projects).

1 month ago | 5

@patricks4971

I like the map because includes a very important topic of the project. Understanding how the Golan is important to both Arabs and Israelies is as interesting as any other topic. As many knows, a lot of Palestinians wouldn't return the Golan to Siria either, if Israel were not a Jewish State and they were in charge of it.

1 month ago | 0

@benjerranger

option 2 is nice, but zoom in a little. logos are small.

1 month ago | 0

@kxnjckx

Keep it neutral and unbiased. Option 1.

1 month ago | 0

@weeniehutstripclub3170

Option 2 looks more modern. Option 1 looks like something from the early 2000s.

1 month ago | 4

@eethkoth4872

Bottom one I think,, but a logo that involves the Israeli and Palestinian flag cut in half and joined would be nice,, could be a bit busy though

1 month ago | 2

@ItsJesusHere

The second option is problematic because it shows one map with both Israel and the west bank and gaza. I think without a map will be better

1 month ago | 2

@RedRedRedRed

The second one looks like a blood stain, I'd absolutely discourage its use 😅

1 month ago | 3

@SeanMoore

I am a keen proponent with one state and equality under the law in both word and deed but much more work (like yours) needs to be done to address extremism on both sides of this dilemma. Both Kach and Hamas are able to frame the debates how they like to their supporters and this has become an increasingly important to address.

1 month ago | 0

@torrentialrage

The map may not have been your idea, but I think it is a bad one.

1 month ago | 25

@n.a.9241

A fight over the map should not be part of the documentation.

1 month ago | 0