I just think PIT, RTC, etc is more interesting (but not the next right thing to do next) than memory management, but, like I said, it's necessary to do these basic kind of things first. Edit: I think it's more interesting because the part I most like and I'm interested on about operating systems, it's not the hardware drivers/control/management, it's the parts of the kernel that are in charge of scheduling, multitasking, file systems, and in general more upper levels (in terms on abstraction layers) of the kernel.
3 years ago (edited) | 2
Oh yeah! Memory management is a good chose. I'm writing my os and I have many questions about memory management
3 years ago | 0
assemblers and linkers so you can use them in os. Help decode the intel docs in to out binary, link, and create an executable.
6 months ago | 0
I know it's too soon but I'm hoping for some multitasking in the near future :) (scheduler, context switches, and all of this) maybe timers will lead to that faster :p
3 years ago | 0
Make a new instance of the os to run on main os using the cpu virtualization capability. I don’t know if bochs support it
2 years ago | 0
nanobyte
What should I cover in the next video?
3 years ago | [YT] | 27