So hopefully that clears up any confusion that some of you may have — and any of you who have falsely accused me of being a "war criminal" in my comment section should expect to receive an angry letter from my Habbo lawyers
1 week ago (edited) | 107
I guessed on a “one of these things is not like the other” basis fully believing I was not gonna get it can’t believe WMDs are fully legal
1 week ago | 5
I mean, WMDs weren't viable on Habbo proper, so it makes sense that wouldn't be covered by the CIW-T
1 week ago (edited) | 10
You know. I clicked by accident, but I got it right. I can't tell if that's an achievement or not. Anyway. I think the idea that there was a "Geneva Convention" of Habbo is so wild in itself, that what was or wasn't in it wasn't really what I was thinking about. If you mentioned it in one of your videos already, and I just forgot, I'm very sorry and I don't expect forgiveness.
1 week ago | 8
Hey, it's not a weapon of mass destruction, it's a device to make you all mass roleplay being dead
1 week ago | 2
I can only imagine the sort of players who would become the legal architects for Habbo agency policy
1 week ago | 0
yaaaay i got it right can i be your vader now supreme chancellor palpa- uh youtuber trolligarch
1 week ago | 0
It's not a "nuke", it's an "iron dome defensive system"... I would never use a powerful weapon sitting idle inside base, that I designed and only I have the keys to, to further my own interests!
1 week ago (edited) | 7
Trolligarch
Which of the following was NOT considered a war crime under Habbo's "Geneva Convention" (the CIW-T)?
1 week ago | [YT] | 182