I would probably because back then we weren’t taught that racism was a horrible problem
2 years ago | 21
If you were an African warlord back in those times, would you still sell your neighbors that you conquered?
2 years ago | 8
Idk. I dont feel like I would, but I'm also kinda lazy, so if I had the money, I may have just bought someone to do my work for me.
2 years ago | 3
No, I don't believe in having others so my work. Plus I'm not the kind to have someone do work for me without paying them.
2 years ago | 1
If your family was slavers probably. But very few people actually had slaves. Why not ask if you were a free black would you have slaves? Free blacks had plenty of slaves. I would like to say I would have bought some just to set them free but who knows
2 years ago | 3
Not sure but I'm not going to say no becuz I probably wouldn't have thought it was normal back then
2 years ago | 3
No, but in reality it probably wouldn't really be because I disagree with it but because I wouldn't have the money to. Slves were extremely expensive and not affordable unless you were a large and rich plantation owner. I do ofc disagree with it 100% but they had a different mindset.
1 year ago | 0
Only 15% seem to have any ideea what tf beign born in that place time and age would imply.
2 years ago | 1
Please share results... I am obviously discluded from voting 🧂
2 years ago | 0
Why would you even ask such questions? 🤨 Just kidding! I saw the vedio
1 year ago (edited) | 0
Oh I'm sure I would. I'm sadistic AF and would of had all kinds of fun
2 years ago | 0
Maybe. But animals are not humans. We should eat tasty animals.
2 years ago | 1
Kinder World
If you were a white male born in the early 19th century in the Southern United States, would you have become an enslaver yourself?
Watch first: https://youtu.be/M6LWqQ8TStw
2 years ago | [YT] | 233