11,936 newtons ≈ 2,682 pounds-force, not 4,200 PSI.
PSI (pressure) and newtons (force) are not the same unit — they mixed them up completely. So their numbers don’t line up mathematically or biologically.
🐊 2. Spinosaurus didn’t have a high bite force
Scientific estimates show Spino’s bite at 4,000–6,000 PSI, not anywhere near 11,000+.
Its skull was long and narrow, built for gripping fish, not crushing bone.
No matter how you spin it, Spino’s bite was far weaker than a T. rex.
🦕 3. Giganotosaurus relied on slicing, not crushing
Its teeth were thin and serrated — “flesh knives,” not bone breakers.
Its bite force of 6,000–8,000 PSI is confirmed by multiple biomechanical studies.
That’s powerful, but still less than one-fifth of T. rex’s 57,000 PSI bite.
💥 4. Size doesn’t equal strength
They said,
“Size does matter in this case.”
That’s wrong — T. rex was actually shorter but far more muscular and denser than Giga or Spino.
T. rex: ~9 tons, compact and tank-like build.
Giga/Spino: larger in length, but lighter and more fragile in structure. So even though Giga or Spino were longer, T. rex had the mass, muscle, and durability advantage.
🔥 5. Calling T. rex a “prehistoric pig” just proves bias
That’s not science — it’s just them getting emotional. When I'm using real data and fossil evidence. They’re just throwing insults.
🦖 Giganotosaurus: Misleading Museum Info
Many museum reconstructions still overestimate its strength or give it T. rex-like features (like massive bite power).
In reality, its bite was relatively weak, designed for slicing flesh, not crushing bone.
Giga’s skull was long and narrow — that means more speed in the bite but less power.
It hunted in bursts, possibly targeting smaller or weakened sauropods, not taking them head-on.
🐊 Spinosaurus: Common Museum Mistakes
Spinosaurus displays often show it standing upright on land like T. rex — that’s wrong.
Newer evidence shows it was semi-aquatic, moving slowly on land and using its jaws to catch fish, not massive prey.
Its bite force was much lower than T. rex — its jaws were long and thin, perfect for gripping slippery prey but not for crushing bones or fighting big dinosaurs.
💥 Meanwhile — Real Tyrannosaurus rex Facts
Bite Force: Over 57,000 PSI, the strongest of any known land animal ever.
Skull built for bone crushing, not slicing — fossilized bones show tooth punctures from other T. rex.
Massive leg muscles and balance made it a powerful brawler, capable of overpowering almost any predator.
🦅Ģųářáśįļéûś Úńįťéđ Ųpřįśįńģ🦅
Been rude like is been not cool to say
🦖 1. They misused bite force units (Newton vs PSI)
When you listed:
Spinosaurus: 4,200 PSI – 11,936 newtons
Giganotosaurus: 6,000–8,000 PSI – 13,530 newtons
That’s wrong.
11,936 newtons ≈ 2,682 pounds-force, not 4,200 PSI.
PSI (pressure) and newtons (force) are not the same unit — they mixed them up completely.
So their numbers don’t line up mathematically or biologically.
🐊 2. Spinosaurus didn’t have a high bite force
Scientific estimates show Spino’s bite at 4,000–6,000 PSI, not anywhere near 11,000+.
Its skull was long and narrow, built for gripping fish, not crushing bone.
No matter how you spin it, Spino’s bite was far weaker than a T. rex.
🦕 3. Giganotosaurus relied on slicing, not crushing
Its teeth were thin and serrated — “flesh knives,” not bone breakers.
Its bite force of 6,000–8,000 PSI is confirmed by multiple biomechanical studies.
That’s powerful, but still less than one-fifth of T. rex’s 57,000 PSI bite.
💥 4. Size doesn’t equal strength
They said,
“Size does matter in this case.”
That’s wrong — T. rex was actually shorter but far more muscular and denser than Giga or Spino.
T. rex: ~9 tons, compact and tank-like build.
Giga/Spino: larger in length, but lighter and more fragile in structure.
So even though Giga or Spino were longer, T. rex had the mass, muscle, and durability advantage.
🔥 5. Calling T. rex a “prehistoric pig” just proves bias
That’s not science — it’s just them getting emotional.
When I'm using real data and fossil evidence. They’re just throwing insults.
🦖 Giganotosaurus: Misleading Museum Info
Many museum reconstructions still overestimate its strength or give it T. rex-like features (like massive bite power).
In reality, its bite was relatively weak, designed for slicing flesh, not crushing bone.
Giga’s skull was long and narrow — that means more speed in the bite but less power.
It hunted in bursts, possibly targeting smaller or weakened sauropods, not taking them head-on.
🐊 Spinosaurus: Common Museum Mistakes
Spinosaurus displays often show it standing upright on land like T. rex — that’s wrong.
Newer evidence shows it was semi-aquatic, moving slowly on land and using its jaws to catch fish, not massive prey.
Its bite force was much lower than T. rex — its jaws were long and thin, perfect for gripping slippery prey but not for crushing bones or fighting big dinosaurs.
💥 Meanwhile — Real Tyrannosaurus rex Facts
Bite Force: Over 57,000 PSI, the strongest of any known land animal ever.
Skull built for bone crushing, not slicing — fossilized bones show tooth punctures from other T. rex.
Massive leg muscles and balance made it a powerful brawler, capable of overpowering almost any predator.
@WilliamAnguirus391
@goteamgodzilla9718
@Elementaltitanzack
@KhonshuTheAbsolutebrute
@Founder202
@ZhamzillaTheKing2025
@purplethegacha
@superherotime7066
@JoaoVitor-md7uq
@TheReptilanDragøTherøpødkaiju
2 days ago | [YT] | 4