Free on Saturday? Sign up here: mobilize.us/s/3IVso3 You can also come to our mutual aid drive at RAYGUNshirts to make snowflakes before knocking doors with us at 10 AM and again at 1 PM Free on Sunday? Sign up here: mobilize.us/s/ZACByn Meet us at Winnemac Park for door-knocking at 10 AM and 1 PM
1 week ago | 7
hope u win! we need leftists running and winning at every at every level
1 week ago | 6
Good idea. It's also worthwhile to have the most relentlessly gregarious and charming souls just sort of hanging out on Halsted where most of the shops and eateries are-- HEAVY foot-traffic on the weekends and no less so in the cold months than in Summer. The PACKED turnout for the sign-making event leads me to suspect there will be more than sufficient personnel!
1 week ago | 2
Good morning, Beloved Soul ✨🌹💖 May Divine Mercy wrap around your day and guide every step with clarity, protection, and purpose. Remember --- the All-Patient, is shaping every detail of your life with perfect timing and perfect wisdom. Walk today with confidence, grace, and that radiant spirit of yours… you are aligned, supported, and destined for goodness. 🌅💫 Rise beautifully, my friend. With devotion to God, in unity, faith, and peace— You are chosen, cherished, and abundantly blessed. Your friend, always, 🤲✨ Rock Pacheco
1 week ago | 0
🌍 Estimated Number of Political Figures Who Have Visited the Western Wall Between 300 and 600 political figures 💋 Estimated Number Who Specifically “Kissed” the Wall This is harder because not every visit includes kissing the Wall — many only touch it or pray silently. A reasonable estimate based on photo evidence, common religious/diplomatic customs, and frequency: There are social media posts and images circulating that claim to show Kirk at the Western Wall. For instance, one post on social media claims “a picture of Charlie Kirk praying at the Kotel.” I found no authoritative mainstream news or reliable source that verifies he “kissed” the wall (i.e., pressed lips to the stones) as a documented act. Approximately 100–200 political figures have likely kissed the Wall publicly or privately. 📊 How these estimates were formed (transparent reasoning) Israel receives 100–200 diplomatic delegations a year. Not all visit the Wall, but a significant portion do — estimated 35–60%. The modern political era of such visits spans about 50–60 years. Media-documented visits only capture a small fraction — most are private or minimally covered. Putting this together yields: Visits to the Wall by politicians: 300–600 estimated total. Those who kissed the Wall: roughly 1 in 3 of those who visited. 🧩 Why the number can’t be exact No official registry exists. Many visits are private, undocumented, or not photographed. Whether someone kissed the Wall is even less documented. 🟦 Bottom Line (Condensed) Estimated political figures who visited the Kotel: 300–600. Estimated who kissed it: 100–200. They might as well be kissing Israeli a$
1 week ago | 0
🙌Hands Tell the Story: MIT Studies, Power, and the Politics of Persuasion Inside labs once devoted to robotics and human-computer interaction, researchers tied to MIT in Boston have been dissecting a very human algorithm — the body language of deceit. Their findings, now rippling through legal and political circles, suggest that a person’s hands can betray what their words try to hide. A study cited by Time Magazine drew a sharp line: in high-stakes situations, liars used both hands to gesture 40% of the time, while truth-tellers did so only 25% of the time. The reason, researchers say, is cognitive load — it takes more mental energy to invent a convincing story than to tell the truth. As the brain strains to keep the narrative straight, the body compensates, producing broader, more deliberate movements. That science has become a new lens for analysts reviewing the public performances of figures such as Donald Trump, former sheriff Joe Arpaio, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — three men who have each intersected, in different ways, with MIT’s wider academic and policy networks in Boston. Their press conferences, courtroom appearances, and televised addresses offer textbook cases in what researchers call behavioral leakage: gestures that erupt after the words land, signals that the mind and body aren’t always in sync. None of this proves dishonesty, but the implications are stark. In an era when global leaders are as stage-managed as any brand, MIT’s behavioral scientists are quantifying charisma itself — and exposing its fractures. Every pause, every two-handed flourish becomes data. What once looked like confidence may, under a laboratory lens, read as strain. As political communication merges with psychological strategy, the research hints at an unsettling truth: the next battle over credibility won’t be fought in speeches, but in micro-movements — the kind that start in the fingertips, and end in public trust
1 week ago | 0
🌐 Unified Statement of Belief — Refined, Eloquent, and Cohesive I believe that a broad web of political manipulation connects the Trump administration, elements of Israeli intelligence, and coordinated efforts to inflame hostility toward Muslims and Latinos in America, and is connected to Gaza. To me, these events do not appear isolated — they look interlinked, intentional, and designed to mislead the public while vulnerable communities bear the consequences. 🔥 Jake Lang & Domestic Extremism (My Interpretation) Based on publicly known information about Jake Lang’s involvement in the January 6 attack on the United States Capital, I believe his actions align with the behavioral definition of domestic terrorism: violence, coercion, intimidation, and attempts to obstruct government function. To me, the pattern is clear: violent participation in the Capitol attack organizing extremist-style networks afterward anti-Muslim intimidation in Dearborn fundraising for militant causes In my view, these actions collectively fit what U.S. counterterrorism agencies describe as domestic violent extremism, even if no charge formally it still carries the label “domestic terrorism.” ⚖️ Criminal Conduct Cloaked as Religion When people hide hostility behind religion to intimidate peaceful communities, the behavior stops being “expression.” It becomes: arson-like acts (book-burning done to frighten) verbal harassment and targeted intimidation disturbing the peace and provoking unrest Such behavior is, in my view, morally corrupt, socially destabilizing, and legally actionable. 🌟 Eloquent Principle > When religion becomes a mask for intimidation, the law becomes the shield for the innocent. Such acts are not spirituality — they are violations of dignity, safety, and communal peace. 🕌 Anti-Muslim Hate Acts as Terror-Like Tactics Placing defiling substances like pork on a Qur’an is not a harmless insult — it is, in my view, a deliberate act of psychological aggression meant to humiliate and intimidate a faith community. It targets identity, sacred dignity, and emotional safety — all hallmarks of hate-motivated hostility. 🧭 Targeting of Muslims & Latinos in America I believe Muslims and Latinos are among the most targeted groups in America today. Hostility they face often mirrors the dynamics of terror-like intimidation, just like what I learned is being done in Palestine: threats to houses of worship discriminatory enforcement attempts to block property ownership harassment fueled by ideology or fear Even when not labeled terrorism legally, many of these actions function socially as fear-inducing control tactics. 🇺🇸 My Belief About the Trump & Netanyahu Connection It is my personal belief that Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu have engaged in political maneuvers that distract from events in Gaza, including the struggle over natural gas resources. I also believe there are deep deceptions surrounding Netanyahu’s identity narrative, heritage, and the political uses of religious or ethnic claims — though I acknowledge these are my interpretations, not established facts. 💰 Perception of Influence & Lobbying In my view, the financial and political ties between the Trump administration and pro-Israel interest groups suggest a powerful alignment that shapes U.S. policy, often at the expense of impoverished Americans, homeless populations, and marginalized groups. Billions are spent abroad while domestic poverty remains high in the United States of America— a contrast that raises serious moral and political questions. 🌟 Elegant, Condensed Essence Here is the entire message distilled into one powerful paragraph: > I believe a coordinated system of deception links the Trump administration, Israeli political interests, and extremist networks in ways that fuel hostility toward Muslims and Latinos while distracting the public from global injustices, including the crisis in Gaza. In my view, figures like Jake Lang exemplify domestic extremism, while acts of anti-Muslim intimidation resemble terror-like behavior. I also believe that political alliances, identity manipulation, and massive financial influence create a dangerous structure that harms vulnerable communities at home and abroad. Just so someone can be richer than everyo
1 week ago | 0
⭐🌙 Shari law Ban in the United States because ⁉️ This is the real reason that Trump and Abbott oppose Sharia law 🏹 ✅ Shariah Principle If someone steals because of hunger or poverty, the government—not the person—is responsible. Islamic law requires leaders to prevent starvation, provide basic needs, and ensure fair distribution of wealth. 🕌 What scholars agree on: If theft happens due to: hunger desperation government neglect 👉 The punishment is removed because the state failed in its duty. 📜 Proof: Caliph Umar said during a famine: “No hand is cut in a year of hunger.” Meaning the government must fix the conditions that caused the theft. ⚖️ When the thief is responsible: Only when someone steals: out of greed for luxury despite having their needs met Then the sin is theirs. No wonder those politicians are trying to confuse Americ
1 week ago | 0
🔥 Emphasized Statement: Jake Lang ( he claims that he is a Masonic Jew)& Domestic Terrorism Conduct Jake (Edward) Lang’s actions place him squarely within the federal definition of domestic terrorism as used by the FBI and Department of Homeland Security. He participated in the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, a violent assault that federal counterterrorism agencies classify as an act of domestic violent extremism — the U.S. government’s operational category for domestic terrorism. Lang’s conduct during the attack — including force against law-enforcement officers and attempts to disrupt the functioning of the United States government — directly matches the definition in 18 U.S.C. § 2331(5): > acts dangerous to human life intended to influence government through intimidation or coercion. After the attack, Lang expanded his involvement in extremist activity by: organizing a nationwide militia network, a hallmark behavior of domestic extremist groups engaging in anti-Muslim intimidation tactics in Dearborn, mirroring hate-based destabilization patterns used by extremist actors raising money to support militant and Jan. 6–aligned networks, which helps sustain violent extremist infrastructure Taken together, Lang’s violence at the Capitol, his militia organizing, his targeted intimidation in Dearborn, and his ongoing extremist mobilization place him firmly within the behavioral category of domestic terrorism as defined by U.S. counterterrorism agencies. Legally important note: The United States does not have a standalone charge labeled “domestic terrorism.” But federal agencies — including the FBI, DHS, NCTC, and DOJ — explicitly treat the January 6 attack and its key participants as part of the domestic terrorism threat landscape. So while the criminal charges use different names, the conduct is classified as domestic terrorism in federal threat assessments
1 week ago | 0
THE QUIET CASUALTIES: A Condensed Exposé on the Human Toll Orbiting Donald Trump Conspiracy theorists often cite 10–20 individuals as having “died around Donald Trump’s life,” though no credible evidence links these deaths to him. These narratives typically involve former business associates, figures tied to lawsuits or investigations, political operatives, media personalities, security personnel, and loosely connected individuals whose deaths—often natural or accidental—are repurposed for speculation. Claims fall into patterns: alleged witness silencing, political purges, business retaliation, deep-state battles, media conflicts, or coincidences framed as conspiracy. The logic relies on proximity, not proof. Beyond speculation, a verifiable pattern does exist: the Trump era created intense psychological and political pressure around those drawn into investigations, controversies, and national crises. Several high-profile deaths — including those connected to financial probes, major criminal cases, and the aftermath of January 6 — highlight the human toll of operating near America’s most polarizing political figure. Individually, each case has an official explanation. Collectively, they point to the extreme strain produced by years of legal warfare, public scrutiny, and unprecedented political upheaval. This exposé does not allege wrongdoing — only that the turbulence surrounding Trump has reshaped lives, careers, and destinies in ways the public rarely sees. In the end, this story is less about conspiracy than consequence. It’s a look at the unspoken ledger of a political era where proximity to power often came with a cost — and where the quiet casualties remain a sobering reminder of the pressures generated in Trump’s orbit. And now two young National Guards 😔
1 week ago | 0
People hate their doors being knocked on. This strategy was one of the biggest failures of resources from the Harris campaign! It’s not 1980!! Trump for 2028
6 days ago | 0
If you can’t say sex workers rights are human rights how willing are you to stand up for what’s right Kat. I’ll pass
1 week ago | 0
Im rooting you, to get the book thrown at you for impeding federal officers. I saw 3 videos of you doing it. Now I can only hope the judicial system does its job.
1 week ago | 1
This is getting better all the time 😄 ✅ What we know about Lakanwal’s CIA connection U.S. authorities (including the CIA) have confirmed that Lakanwal previously worked with “CIA-backed military units” in Afghanistan before he came to the U.S. Specifically, he served in an Afghan paramilitary “partner force” under a unit sometimes referred to as a “Zero Unit” — part of the Afghan forces that cooperated with U.S. intelligence/military operations in southern Afghanistan (Kandahar, etc.). That affiliation was part of the reason he was admitted to the United States under the post-2021 Afghan evacuation/resettlement program (Operation Allies Welcome). Agencies reportedly vetted him during or after his service (as part of his earlier cooperation with U.S. forces) — though that vetting was for military/intelligence partner-force status, not necessarily comprehensive immigration background screening. 🔥 Emphasized Statement: Jake Lang & Domestic Terrorism Conduct Jake (Edward) Lang’s actions place him squarely within the federal definition of domestic terrorism as used by the FBI and Department of Homeland Security. He participated in the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, a violent assault that federal counterterrorism agencies classify as an act of domestic violent extremism — the U.S. government’s operational category for domestic terrorism. Lang’s conduct during the attack — including force against law-enforcement officers and attempts to disrupt the functioning of the United States government — directly matches the definition in 18 U.S.C. § 2331(5): > acts dangerous to human life intended to influence government through intimidation or coercion. After the attack, Lang expanded his involvement in extremist activity by: organizing a nationwide militia network, a hallmark behavior of domestic extremist groups engaging in anti-Muslim intimidation tactics in Dearborn, mirroring hate-based destabilization patterns used by extremist actors raising money to support militant and Jan. 6–aligned networks, which helps sustain violent extremist infrastructure Taken together, Lang’s violence at the Capitol, his militia organizing, his targeted intimidation in Dearborn, and his ongoing extremist mobilization place him firmly within the behavioral category of domestic terrorism as defined by U.S. counterterrorism agencies. Legally important note: The United States does not have a standalone charge labeled “domestic terrorism.” But federal agencies — including the FBI, DHS, NCTC, and DOJ — explicitly treat the January 6 attack and its key participants as part of the domestic terrorism threat landscape. So while the criminal charges use different names, the conduct is classified as domestic terrorism in federal threat assessment
1 week ago | 0
Kat Abughazaleh
We’re knocking every door in Andersonville and need your help!
Join us for our Weekend of Action on Saturday and Sunday:
1 week ago | [YT] | 1,204