It’s over RZ, as you can see I have drawn Calvin as the soy-jack and Arminius as the Chad
2 months ago | 46
Why should we bother to listen to your suggestion here when you admit you failed to understand anything presented first time around? How about you humbly post an apology video for your errors, lies and misrepresentations towards Joe?
2 months ago | 13
Even if St. Thomas Aquinas agrees with you (which I’m not granting), so what? Are you aware that Saints are not considered infallible in the Catholic Church, and that St. Thomas Aquinas—despite his prominence—has gotten things wrong before? You still need to critique Joe’s arguments within the broader Catholic context. On a side note: who gave you the authority to decide who’s a true or false Calvinist? Your mainline Calvinist churches, by your own admission, are corrupt—yet you’re acting like you know exactly what Calvinism is. No, you’re not the pope of Calvinism, and those people you call “false Calvinists” probably see you as a false Calvinist too. That’s the Protestant mess right there! Who am I supposed to approach in your Calvinist church to know what true Calvinism even is? Be humble, brother, and disagree with Catholics humbly and respectfully. Those confessional documents of yours are only as useful as long as Protestants agree with them. Your churches don’t hold doctrines to be unchangeable, you don’t claim to be infallible, and you even admit that your church could change its mind on doctrine. So who are you to act like the pope of Calvinism especially when your own mainline churches are heretical and you don't have a have a pope-like figure to protect true doctrine?? I don’t get it. Catholics have every right to critique Protestant beliefs that are actually held by Protestants—regardless of your confessional documents—especially when those beliefs are the predominant ones. Thankfully, you deleted that horrible first video of yours. That was horrible!!!
2 months ago (edited) | 12
RZ, did you delete that because you said you are "not intellectually dishonest" implying Joe is?
2 months ago | 4
I had to force myself to watch the entire video. He took 20 minutes just to make a single point. I even sent the video to my brother who had to read Summa theologica to get his MDiv. Even he had to rewind the video several times just to figure out what he was saying. And then, after this whole filibuster through this complicated elaborate explanation of how Joe‘s argument was a strawman, he ended up just proving Joe’s point. Except instead of John MacArthur and RC Sproul, it was Thomas Aquinas. Truly, next level gaslighting.
2 months ago | 9
Im not going to watch this but I will tell you what it's about.
2 months ago | 6
When will you become catholic RZ, I can’t keep waiting forever
2 months ago | 11
thanks for the recommendation. always good to find a new channel with fresh arguments
2 months ago | 0
Anglicanism tolerating Calvinism is why I could never have been Anglican. Calvin’s Eucharistic theology isn’t the worst but it sucks and reduces the blessed Sacrament. “Is means is so long as is does not really mean is” -Calvin
2 months ago | 0
I’m Catholic and it’s so frustrating when other Catholics think the Calvinistic view of predestination is heresy
2 months ago
| 7
I don't think Aquinas does do that. But this is an opportunity to engage Joe in debate on the canon of scripture.
2 months ago | 3
Did I understand correctly that Sean takes a total depravity view but then uses Aquinas on predestination?
2 months ago | 0
Give it up, bro. Your positions are contradictory and untenable.
2 months ago | 26
Redeemed Zoomer
Since I took down my initial video responding to Joe Heschmeyer's critique of "Calvinism" and replaced it with one that focused on how to rightly define Calvinism, here's a video from my friend @anglicanaesthetics that actually addresses Joe's initial arguments which my responses didn't do.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cISHH...
Despite the fact that Sean Luke from Anglican Aesthetics and I disagree on some issues related to the Mainlines, he's still a great Protestant apologist that I highly recommend on issues like this
2 months ago | [YT] | 179