The one that still has a physical disc drive. If none support it, then none of them.
1 week ago | 654
400ish is a pipe dream for any system coming out in the future, weaker or not.
1 week ago | 119
feels like the PS5 hasn't even started it's generation
1 week ago | 122
My backlog is hundreds of games strong at this point, going back multiple generations. I think I’m good.
1 week ago | 24
69% voted for 700ish, no wonder they keep jacking up the price.
1 week ago | 47
Out of the options, the cheaper one, however, I may be sitting out entirely with how high the price of gaming is becoming.
1 week ago | 11
“Neither” really should be an option here. There’s simply nothing short of a holodeck that Sony could put out that would make me feel like I need more power than what the base PS5 (not even the PS5 Pro) offers. Especially if they’re going to support it with games the same way they have the PS5, which is to say, barely at all. I still use mine mainly to play PS4 games, or PS5 ports of old games.
1 week ago (edited) | 1
None of them, been gaming for over 30 years and this is the last console generation I will ever support. Do I have the money, yes, do I support the crap games that keep getting made, no.
1 week ago (edited) | 59
Neither, I didn't even bother to buy a PS5. The only way I would ever give Playstation money again is if they moved back to Japan and got completely new management.
1 week ago | 27
Wherever the disc drive is, has my money. Not going to give up my physical collection.
1 week ago | 21
Neither, the PS5 still has no games, I'm not spending another 600 plus on an over glorified paper weight
1 week ago | 28
Spawn Wave
If Sony releases a cheaper PS6S that is just a little stronger than the PS5 and a more expensive PS6 that is multiple times stronger than the PS5 which one would you be more interested in buying?
1 week ago | [YT] | 823