Interested in both Axum and Actix. I recently started a backend development and couldn't figure out which framework to start with. So it would be nice to see a comparison between all the available options, because i simply picked the one with most stars
1 year ago | 18
For HTTP I always use Hyper. I love building my own systems without any anoying abstractions and limits
1 year ago (edited) | 5
I'm more into embedded and desktop applications so a broader overview of the things that are out there on the server side would be way more helpful for me.
1 year ago | 5
one thing i had trouble with was SSE. it works in axum if you paste some config stuff (theres an example in their repo) to prevent the http connection from closing, but it's not pretty. at all. i haven't tried many frameworks but i assume they all more or less achieve the basic "respond with html/image/...", so for me its usually 1. which unusual/niche features do i need 2. who supports it 3. yeah im picking that one
1 year ago | 0
I'm fairly familiar with actix and it has served me incredibly well, but I'm most interested in learning more about axum at the moment
1 year ago | 1
I heard axum is the easiest one. i tried warp but filters are too complicated for me
1 year ago | 0
Mainly use Axum but also interested in poem because of native support for openapi spec
1 year ago | 1
I like hyper because it is more low level, letting me have more control over how requests are handled and relying less on opaque macros
1 year ago | 0
I was interested in using Rocket until I saw that there is no longer active and useful development on it
1 year ago | 0
Let's Get Rusty
Which server-side framework are you most interested in?
1 year ago | [YT] | 67