Why would I want the minimum ducks? I want MAXIMUM DUCKS
2 months ago
| 8,900
Need a 38 minute video with the explanation for why the answer is 2 ducks
2 months ago | 10,000
3 ducks, all three ducks are named “Two Ducks” Edit: thanks to the contribution of spacefun101 we’re at a new minimum of Zero ducks
2 months ago (edited) | 6,500
Two ducks - if you circumnavigate the globe, they're in front, behind, and between themselves
2 months ago | 868
One duck, named 'Two Ducks', with a portal behind and in front of it.
2 months ago | 300
This isn’t a logic question at all, really it’s an example of language ambiguity
2 months ago | 6,000
Ducks always walk in single file to hide their numbers.
2 months ago | 97
All 4 ducks walked up to the lemonade stand and they said to the man running the stand "Hey, do you have any grapes?"
2 months ago | 1,300
The riddle "Teetar ke 2 aage teetar..." has gone international 😂
2 months ago | 138
The answer is obviously one duck. A ‘duck’ is obviously referring to a strong linen or cotton fabric in this instance. Therefore, we can fold a duck into a sine wave pattern to have two ducks per bump. Using this method, we accomplish the task with one sheet of duck.
2 months ago | 147
The real riddle is 'what does the riddler means by "in between" ?'
2 months ago | 13
The riddle refers to a guy sleeping on a bench in a park. He recently changed his name to "two ducks in front of two ducks, two ducks behind two ducks and two ducks in between", and he identifies as plural.
1 month ago | 12
Veritasium
Can you solve this riddle from our latest newsletter? veritasium.kit.com/65e0c72018
There are two ducks in front of two ducks, two ducks behind two ducks and two ducks in between.
What is the minimum number of ducks that makes this possible?
2 months ago | [YT] | 7,134