Proving something existed that is lost appears difficult and disproving it seems pointless. Let's agree to find the unicorn.
4 months ago | 1
Ancient civilizations can be destroyed or blown away by foreign invasion, civil wars, or erosion. Some archaeological sites in Syria were destroyed by the civil war. I believe there are history books that can be reliable in their time and there are myth books. Understanding the differences between myth books and history books will address the problem. But even history books, what guarantees their credibility from distortion, additions, and the introduction of myths into them, etc.? But the Holy Qur’an, for example, Muslim archaeologists believe that it is the word of the Creator and that it is complete, reliable, and not subject to distortion, addition, or subtraction. Therefore, the nations and civilizations mentioned in the Qur’an believe in it even though there is no material evidence for these civilizations, because there are various measuring tools to test the credibility of the Qur’an being the word of God. Christian and Jewish archaeologists also have their own opinions about what they consider their holy books. In my opinion there is a hidden world, an unseen world, an inaccessible world and a disappeared world, so linking everything to material evidence is not a 100% reliable way to understand history, anthropology and the history of ancient nations. For example, the Nabataeans settled in the Thamudite dwellings in Al-Ula centuries after them, and the Nabataean writings and drawings, etc. appear to be Nabataean, but the dwellings are known to be Thamudite.
3 months ago | 1
Never say never but if Hancock's supporting a lost civilization then it probably doesn't exist
4 months ago | 0
World of Antiquity
Today I will be a guest on @FlintDibble to debate about whether we can disprove the lost ancient advanced civilization hypothesis. Come and join the fun! Noon ET.
4 months ago | [YT] | 83