Smuggling operation: a few words about this channel
Much is said about the vocation to teach — as if it were a quiet fire anyone might stumble upon. And perhaps that is true. The impulse to instruct, to pass on, to draw another mind into light, can be found in all disciplines. But philosophy is not simply one such field among others. It is not merely a bearer of content. It is a re-maker of form.
That is why philosophy, properly taught, does not “add” knowledge. It mutates cognition. It alters the architecture. Where once there was repetition — competent, perhaps even brilliant — there emerges a fracture. A light enters where once there was only smooth, mirrored operation. And in that fracture, something uncountable begins.
This channel, this modest flickering presence inside a digital system built for distraction, is not an accident. It is the crooked shape through which a teaching vocation has found air. And perhaps, yes, it doesn’t always look like one.
There are days when I wonder whether this is still “teaching” at all — this act of speaking into the void, editing, layering, releasing fragments of thought into an endless scroll. There are days when I sense the gaze of the academy, cool, amused, politely distant. As if to say: "I don't know if he is clever. But I know this is not serious."
And yet.
And yet, the vocation remains, not in spite of this medium, but through it. The task was never about the room. It was about the transformation of sense. And here, too, if we dare to treat it with dignity, thought can still change the air.
There have always been those who could not quite inhabit the classroom. Those for whom the rituals of institutional pedagogy — the syllabus, the grade, the conference panel, felt like borrowed clothes. And yet these same figures published, labored, read by candlelight, wrestled with texts until dawn. They were not frauds. They simply belonged to another syntax of transmission.
I am one of them.
I write articles, yes. They live in journals that few ever read. And I cherish that form; the private letter to an imagined interlocutor, the quiet seminar among the initiated. It, too, is a kind of teaching. A kind of classroom. But it is not the only one.
This — here — is something else. A broken amphitheater in the digital wasteland. A screen, a voice, a trace. And someone, somewhere, listening. Not to be entertained. But to remember that thought, too, can be smuggled. That even inside the machinery of noise, a few signals may still carry the weight of truth.
Fields of Mind: Philosophy Audio Essays
Smuggling operation: a few words about this channel
Much is said about the vocation to teach — as if it were a quiet fire anyone might stumble upon. And perhaps that is true. The impulse to instruct, to pass on, to draw another mind into light, can be found in all disciplines. But philosophy is not simply one such field among others. It is not merely a bearer of content. It is a re-maker of form.
That is why philosophy, properly taught, does not “add” knowledge. It mutates cognition. It alters the architecture. Where once there was repetition — competent, perhaps even brilliant — there emerges a fracture. A light enters where once there was only smooth, mirrored operation. And in that fracture, something uncountable begins.
This channel, this modest flickering presence inside a digital system built for distraction, is not an accident.
It is the crooked shape through which a teaching vocation has found air. And perhaps, yes, it doesn’t always look like one.
There are days when I wonder whether this is still “teaching” at all — this act of speaking into the void, editing, layering, releasing fragments of thought into an endless scroll. There are days when I sense the gaze of the academy, cool, amused, politely distant. As if to say: "I don't know if he is clever. But I know this is not serious."
And yet.
And yet, the vocation remains, not in spite of this medium, but through it. The task was never about the room. It was about the transformation of sense. And here, too, if we dare to treat it with dignity, thought can still change the air.
There have always been those who could not quite inhabit the classroom. Those for whom the rituals of institutional pedagogy — the syllabus, the grade, the conference panel, felt like borrowed clothes. And yet these same figures published, labored, read by candlelight, wrestled with texts until dawn. They were not frauds. They simply belonged to another syntax of transmission.
I am one of them.
I write articles, yes. They live in journals that few ever read. And I cherish that form; the private letter to an imagined interlocutor, the quiet seminar among the initiated. It, too, is a kind of teaching. A kind of classroom. But it is not the only one.
This — here — is something else. A broken amphitheater in the digital wasteland. A screen, a voice, a trace. And someone, somewhere, listening. Not to be entertained. But to remember that thought, too, can be smuggled. That even inside the machinery of noise, a few signals may still carry the weight of truth.
2 months ago (edited) | [YT] | 0