Karen Read, who drunk and angry …and who was furious with John (proven by rage-filled voicemails left the night of his death), dropped him off at 34 Fairview Road—the exact place he was found dead the next morning…
She then threw her Lexus SUV into reverse, hammered 75% throttle (confirmed by vehicle event recorder data), and backed up 88 feet at approximately 24 mph - drunk and angry …
Her right rear taillight shattered while backing up crazy fast (confirmed by vehicle inspection, photographs, and witnesses seeing it intact earlier that evening).
Fragments of that shattered taillight were forensically matched to Karen’s SUV and were found both in the snow at the scene and embedded in John O’Keefe’s clothing (confirmed in crime lab testimony and forensic reports).
John suffered a blunt force injury to the back of the head—with skull fractures and brain swelling—consistent with being knocked down by a reversing vehicle and falling backward, not an animal attack or indoor fight. This was backed by medical examiner testimony and injury modeling.
Then, in multiple recorded conversations, Karen admits her own doubts—saying, “I didn’t think I hit him, hit him… but could I have clipped him?” and “What if I hit his foot, or his knee, and he fell?”—these are statements of consciousness of guilt, and they came straight from her mouth, no spin.
Aaaaaaaand…
The entire prosecution theory was confirmed by the defense’s own expert witness, Dr. Daniel Wolfe. His crash dummy recreation matched the injuries, the taillight break pattern, and even the tear in John’s jacket. He testified that Karen’s Lexus could have caused those exact injuries…
And yet, despite all of this, … the jury couldn’t conclude that Karen hit John with her car?
I feel for John’s family that the person who killed him gets to walk free.
Fig.Solves
So let me get this straight…
Karen Read, who drunk and angry …and who was furious with John (proven by rage-filled voicemails left the night of his death), dropped him off at 34 Fairview Road—the exact place he was found dead the next morning…
She then threw her Lexus SUV into reverse, hammered 75% throttle (confirmed by vehicle event recorder data), and backed up 88 feet at approximately 24 mph - drunk and angry …
Her right rear taillight shattered while backing up crazy fast (confirmed by vehicle inspection, photographs, and witnesses seeing it intact earlier that evening).
Fragments of that shattered taillight were forensically matched to Karen’s SUV and were found both in the snow at the scene and embedded in John O’Keefe’s clothing (confirmed in crime lab testimony and forensic reports).
John suffered a blunt force injury to the back of the head—with skull fractures and brain swelling—consistent with being knocked down by a reversing vehicle and falling backward, not an animal attack or indoor fight. This was backed by medical examiner testimony and injury modeling.
Then, in multiple recorded conversations, Karen admits her own doubts—saying, “I didn’t think I hit him, hit him… but could I have clipped him?” and “What if I hit his foot, or his knee, and he fell?”—these are statements of consciousness of guilt, and they came straight from her mouth, no spin.
Aaaaaaaand…
The entire prosecution theory was confirmed by the defense’s own expert witness, Dr. Daniel Wolfe. His crash dummy recreation matched the injuries, the taillight break pattern, and even the tear in John’s jacket. He testified that Karen’s Lexus could have caused those exact injuries…
And yet, despite all of this, … the jury couldn’t conclude that Karen hit John with her car?
I feel for John’s family that the person who killed him gets to walk free.
2 months ago | [YT] | 104