Denied, as the state determines the necessary deadlines for filings, not the Incompetant. You will continue to undergo due process under municipal, state and US federal jurisdictions, citizen.
6 months ago | 1
Well it tells you where you're going to go. To "ready status" for the panel to consider your appeal. Just like you were told a month ago, the commonwealth really doesn't NEED to file a rebuttal to your appeal. If you're spouting the same wrong case law and cherry picked quotes as you have in comments here, there's nothing for them to rebut. The appeal panel will still look at what you filed in appeal, realize you have no legal standing in appeal, and affirm the original decision of the lower court because states are able to set their own traffic laws. Including those requiring driver's licenses. And they'll use the actual legal definitions of the words as determined by Massachusetts law to do so, not some twisted and misconstrued version that you've selected. Pity though. I did want to read what the reply to your appeal would have been from the point of a competent attorney. Guess they realized it wasn't worth their time.
5 months ago | 1
So you filed a motion (incorrectly... Again...) that got the court to put your case into ready status for the panel to review. Then you apparently filed the exact same motion again... A motion to compel. What do you need the lower court to do? That's what you compel in an appeal. Are you trying to compel the commonwealth to respond? As the court has shown by moving it to ready status, they don't need to. And consideration of constitutional principles. Which isn't even a motion in a legal action. You want the court to consider the constitution? Isn't that what's in your arguments you filed originally? You don't get to add more to it in motions later...
5 months ago | 0
Jonathan Mazzilliđ˘liberty or death
The state has once again failed to file their brief or anything else in time..
Let's see where we go from hear!
6 months ago | [YT] | 6