š§ A simple note about spectrum analysers & ā4.5 Hz/7.83 Hz/528 Hzā š
Every now and then I see comments like: > āI measured this and it isnāt 4.5 Hz, itās around 100 Hz.ā > āI checked this ā528 Hzā track and I donāt see a big 528 spike.ā
- The carrier ā the actual tone you hear in your ear (for example ~100 Hz) - The beat frequency ā the difference between left and right (for example 4.5 Hz or 0.5 Hz)
Example:
- Left ear: 100 Hz - Right ear: 104.5 Hz - Your brain: āThereās a 4.5 Hz difference between these two.ā
That 4.5 Hz is not a big separate note you can point to.. Itās a slow wobble created by the gap between the two audible tones.
Same with 0.5 Hz: itās the difference between two close carriers (for example 100/100.5 Hz), not a low rumbling note on its own.
---
š Why you donāt āhearā 4.5 Hz as a pitch
Human hearing only picks up pitches from roughly 20 Hz and up.
So:
- You donāt hear 4.5 Hz or 0.5 Hz as a normal ānoteā - You experience them as slow pulsing / drifting in the sound - A spectrum analyser will mainly show you the carriers (80ā200 Hz-ish) and the noise/bass, not a giant spike at 4.5 Hz or 0.5 Hz
When someone measures a track and says: > āThis looks like ~100 Hz, not 4.5 Hz,ā thatās actually correct.. Theyāre looking at the carrier tone. The brainwave number (4.5, 7.83, 0.5, etc.) is the gap between left and right channels, not the main pitch youāre hearing.
Most of my binaural carriers live roughly in the 80ā200 Hz range, and the entrainment comes from the difference between them.
Another common one is: > āI analysed this and I donāt see 528 Hz.ā
In that track:
- The deep delta work is done by a 0.5 Hz binaural beat around ~100 Hz (for example 100/100.5 Hz). - The 528 Hz āmiracleā tone is used as a harmonic layer in the grid. Itās part of the architecture, not the main loud carrier.
On an analyser youāll usually see:
- Big energy in the low carriers (around 80ā200 Hz) - Bass and pink-noise bands - The 528 Hz layer will often look smaller or be masked unless you zoom in with higher resolution.
So if your app shows āstrong ~100 Hz, smaller 528 Hz,ā that doesnāt mean 528 āisnāt thereā ā it just isnāt the dominant thing in the mix. The track is built as a full field, not a single blaring 528 test tone.
---
š About spectrum analysers in general
Analysers mostly show:
- Whatever is loudest (bass, noise, carriers) - Smaller harmonic layers and subtle tones can look tiny or āinvisibleā if: - the FFT size is low - youāre zoomed out on the whole spectrum - thereās a lot of pink noise and bass on top
All of my frequencies are set numerically in the DAW. Iām not guessing or eyeballing them. I actually want people to be curious and check what theyāre listening to, but it helps to know what youāre looking at.
Itās always a bit of a shame when someone assumes Iām trying to deceive them, because thatās just not the case. Thereās a lot of care, maths and intention behind these builds. If you ever want the exact frequency stack for a specific track, drop a comment on that video and Iāll happily break it down. š
REIDOS Sonic Healing
š§ A simple note about spectrum analysers & ā4.5 Hz/7.83 Hz/528 Hzā š
Every now and then I see comments like:
> āI measured this and it isnāt 4.5 Hz, itās around 100 Hz.ā
> āI checked this ā528 Hzā track and I donāt see a big 528 spike.ā
Totally fair questions.. hereās whatās actually happening.
---
š§ How binaural beats work
A binaural beat has two things going on:
- The carrier ā the actual tone you hear in your ear (for example ~100 Hz)
- The beat frequency ā the difference between left and right (for example 4.5 Hz or 0.5 Hz)
Example:
- Left ear: 100 Hz
- Right ear: 104.5 Hz
- Your brain: āThereās a 4.5 Hz difference between these two.ā
That 4.5 Hz is not a big separate note you can point to.. Itās a slow wobble created by the gap between the two audible tones.
Same with 0.5 Hz: itās the difference between two close carriers (for example 100/100.5 Hz), not a low rumbling note on its own.
---
š Why you donāt āhearā 4.5 Hz as a pitch
Human hearing only picks up pitches from roughly 20 Hz and up.
So:
- You donāt hear 4.5 Hz or 0.5 Hz as a normal ānoteā
- You experience them as slow pulsing / drifting in the sound
- A spectrum analyser will mainly show you the carriers (80ā200 Hz-ish) and the noise/bass, not a giant spike at 4.5 Hz or 0.5 Hz
When someone measures a track and says:
> āThis looks like ~100 Hz, not 4.5 Hz,ā
thatās actually correct.. Theyāre looking at the carrier tone. The brainwave number (4.5, 7.83, 0.5, etc.) is the gap between left and right channels, not the main pitch youāre hearing.
Most of my binaural carriers live roughly in the 80ā200 Hz range, and the entrainment comes from the difference between them.
---
šÆ Example: āDNA Repair Grid | 528 Hz & Delta Healing Blueprintā
Another common one is:
> āI analysed this and I donāt see 528 Hz.ā
In that track:
- The deep delta work is done by a 0.5 Hz binaural beat around ~100 Hz (for example 100/100.5 Hz).
- The 528 Hz āmiracleā tone is used as a harmonic layer in the grid. Itās part of the architecture, not the main loud carrier.
On an analyser youāll usually see:
- Big energy in the low carriers (around 80ā200 Hz)
- Bass and pink-noise bands
- The 528 Hz layer will often look smaller or be masked unless you zoom in with higher resolution.
So if your app shows āstrong ~100 Hz, smaller 528 Hz,ā that doesnāt mean 528 āisnāt thereā ā it just isnāt the dominant thing in the mix. The track is built as a full field, not a single blaring 528 test tone.
---
š About spectrum analysers in general
Analysers mostly show:
- Whatever is loudest (bass, noise, carriers)
- Smaller harmonic layers and subtle tones can look tiny or āinvisibleā if:
- the FFT size is low
- youāre zoomed out on the whole spectrum
- thereās a lot of pink noise and bass on top
All of my frequencies are set numerically in the DAW. Iām not guessing or eyeballing them. I actually want people to be curious and check what theyāre listening to, but it helps to know what youāre looking at.
Itās always a bit of a shame when someone assumes Iām trying to deceive them, because thatās just not the case. Thereās a lot of care, maths and intention behind these builds. If you ever want the exact frequency stack for a specific track, drop a comment on that video and Iāll happily break it down. š
2 weeks ago | [YT] | 124