Techlore

VICTORY: Synology just backed down on their restrictive drive policy!

After massive community backlash, Synology will now allow non-verified third-party drives on 2025 Plus, Value, and J-series NAS models with DSM 7.3. Some backstory: Synology wanted enterprise margins on prosumer gear, so they locked NAS devices to "validated" drives and spammed DANGER warnings if you used standard drives.

But there's a catch: This only affects NEW 2025 models. Older devices are still locked down, and enterprise xs+ models keep the restrictions.

Keep that energy. Consumer pressure works 🔥
Source: arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/10/synology-caves-wal…

1 week ago | [YT] | 409



@infinitebeast5517

Still won't be getting one in the future. The recent thing they just did was to disable hardware encoding

1 week ago | 51

@bobafett2598

They are on the blacklist. They had one job, and they failed.

1 week ago | 22

@bthemedia

Was saving up for Synology solution for backup and remote site backup… when that arbitrary policy change came out 🚩 no way support them again as they do not support consumer

5 days ago | 1

@koke4thewin

The fact they thought they could do it,is why no one will buy in future. The fact they are willing to make such a hostile move and are forced to back down will make other Nas companies think twice before they try something similar. I wanted this for a home cloud. Not anymore

1 week ago | 13

@lawfulacts1955

Because of their earlier decision, many people have discovered more affordable and open solutions that does everything their products do.

6 days ago | 6

@m3lar

IDGAF. If they did it once, they can, and probably are going to try to do this again I am not buying anything for them

1 week ago | 4

@llllxxxxllll

"non-verified third-party" f synology

1 week ago | 9

@MoiraLachesis

Thank you for saving me from stumbling into this mess

5 days ago | 0

@lukedavis436

Netgear ReadyNAS Duo once Again shining above the Rest 💖

1 week ago | 1

@Devious1984

I'll be building my own NAS, rather than a prebuilt.

1 week ago | 1

@HeavilyForkedBardsWar

Looking alternative NAS solutions

1 week ago | 2

@wethermon

My sincere opinion...if at 1st you don't succeed try again until you do. I would avoid this brand for sure.

1 week ago | 2

@WeabieBoo

Too late. I already went with Ugreen because they did that. The thing is..... I couldn't even fathom why someone would try to restrict storage to be proprietary. Especially for someone that even knows what a NAS is

5 days ago | 0

@AshleyFrazer-p4m

If they cant reverse the policy on older 25 devices the owners should return them under warranty?

5 days ago | 0

@BraceletGrolf

They only did it because sales collapsed on their products

1 week ago | 1

@martinlutherkingjr.5582

Older devices are still locked down? Mine isn’t

1 week ago | 5

@kerkertrandov459

Idk what a NAS is

1 week ago | 0

@Thatelse

They stopped this because they got their ass handed to them by UGREEN. Too little too late in my eyes. They have shown their face. I won't be recommending them and if I hear a friend wants to buy one, I'll encourage him to reconsider.

6 days ago (edited) | 0