The BART Police Officer should also be permanently terminated, prohibited from working in any law enforcement capacity, stripped of his post certification/license, prosecuted to the fullest extent. Not only this officer is a liability, he also violated the law
3 weeks ago (edited) | 22
So BART police intentionally lied but chose “inaccuracy” wording even after the settlement?
3 weeks ago | 21
So the Officer lied? And BART took them at their word? Or did BART also try to cover up their criminal activity? I'm guessing both?
3 weeks ago | 10
He fked up then tried to cover it up? Inaccurate info….is a lie. Fire him immediately
2 weeks ago | 2
Lowering law enforcement hiring standards in the pursuit of diversity goals is ALWAYS a bad idea- just ask Tyre Nichols...
2 weeks ago | 0
Body cams still out here proving police are correct 99% of the time, report on that ABC
2 weeks ago | 0
Well, the only thing certain about this story is that ABC can't be trusted to provide objective and accurate facts.
3 weeks ago | 0
Just California things, stopped someone lawfully, come to find out she’s got warrants and then tries to close your arms in the window and peel off but she gets a fat check? And to think they used to say crime doesn’t pay 😂
3 weeks ago | 2
'Shot in the back' will result in a payout every single time. Cmon BART cops
2 weeks ago | 0
ABC7 News Bay Area
BART and the family of a young woman shot in the back by one of its officers have agreed on a $6.75 million settlement, the transit agency said.
BART also acknowledges that the initial story it put out to the public, which alleged Jasmine Gao had assaulted an officer, was inaccurate. Story here: abc7news.com/17811085/
#bart #unioncity #settlement #abc7news
3 weeks ago (edited) | [YT] | 106