Вот точный и стилистически выверенный перевод на английский язык:
One Source: Awareness Across Cultures, Symbols, and Eras
While studying primary sources and comparing myths, symbols, and texts, I, as a researcher, could not shake the feeling: all of it — these varied traditions — are facets of the same knowledge. Not a set of disparate religions, not competing ideologies, but a single core truth conveyed in different forms depending on culture, language, time, conceptual framework, and symbolic structure.
I arrived at this not through someone’s advice. Not by hearing — but by understanding. Not by repeating — but by discovering, through systematic reading, comparison, critical thinking, and an inner sense of truth. Later, I learned that others had reached similar insights — Sufis, Hermeticists, Neoplatonists, Kabbalists, Jung, Campbell, Guénon. But that’s not the point.
What matters is this: the hypothesis of a Single Source refracted through human perceptual systems is not just a theory. It is a working model. And if it holds more truth than religious conflicts do, then it is viable.
I tested this hypothesis through artificial intelligence — not on the level of belief, but of linguistic structures, symbols, and recurring archetypes. The machine confirmed it: a high degree of correlation, common patterns, consistent cross-cultural codes. Even across millennia, continents, and hostile civilizations, the same keys reappear.
This is not proof — but it is a serious argument. The probability that humanity received knowledge from a single source is high. But the forms varied — shaped by each people’s development, mode of thinking, and survival needs.
Hence the conflicts. Hence the blindness. People argue about form, forgetting they speak of the same essence. They argue about messengers without hearing the message. They argue about symbols, losing the meaning.
This doesn’t mean all religions are the same. It means all authentic traditions are attempts to express the same revelation — but in different terms.
If this is true, then humanity must move beyond confessional, tribal thinking. It’s time to recognize that truth lies not in boundaries but in depth — not in names, but in essence.
And if one day a human, a machine, or a union between the two can translate this into a universal language — not of symbols, but of structures — we may draw closer to what was once called Revelation.
Константин Бедовой . Konstantin Bedovoy .
Вот точный и стилистически выверенный перевод на английский язык:
One Source: Awareness Across Cultures, Symbols, and Eras
While studying primary sources and comparing myths, symbols, and texts, I, as a researcher, could not shake the feeling: all of it — these varied traditions — are facets of the same knowledge. Not a set of disparate religions, not competing ideologies, but a single core truth conveyed in different forms depending on culture, language, time, conceptual framework, and symbolic structure.
I arrived at this not through someone’s advice. Not by hearing — but by understanding. Not by repeating — but by discovering, through systematic reading, comparison, critical thinking, and an inner sense of truth. Later, I learned that others had reached similar insights — Sufis, Hermeticists, Neoplatonists, Kabbalists, Jung, Campbell, Guénon. But that’s not the point.
What matters is this: the hypothesis of a Single Source refracted through human perceptual systems is not just a theory. It is a working model. And if it holds more truth than religious conflicts do, then it is viable.
I tested this hypothesis through artificial intelligence — not on the level of belief, but of linguistic structures, symbols, and recurring archetypes. The machine confirmed it: a high degree of correlation, common patterns, consistent cross-cultural codes. Even across millennia, continents, and hostile civilizations, the same keys reappear.
This is not proof — but it is a serious argument. The probability that humanity received knowledge from a single source is high. But the forms varied — shaped by each people’s development, mode of thinking, and survival needs.
Hence the conflicts. Hence the blindness. People argue about form, forgetting they speak of the same essence. They argue about messengers without hearing the message. They argue about symbols, losing the meaning.
This doesn’t mean all religions are the same. It means all authentic traditions are attempts to express the same revelation — but in different terms.
If this is true, then humanity must move beyond confessional, tribal thinking. It’s time to recognize that truth lies not in boundaries but in depth — not in names, but in essence.
And if one day a human, a machine, or a union between the two can translate this into a universal language — not of symbols, but of structures — we may draw closer to what was once called Revelation.
4 months ago | [YT] | 7