Consider the following statements in light of the supreme court's recent ruling on child trafficking and relevant constitutional principles: 1. A trafficked child cannot be treated as an accomplice, as this would violate the expanded interpretation of Article 21. 2. Convention in trafficking cases may rest solely on the credible testimony of the victim, consistent with established Criminal Jurisprudence. 3. Article 39(E) and (F) are irrelevant for courts while evolving standards of Evidence, as they are Non- Justiciable. 4. Expectation of immediate resistance by a trafficked child conforms to the test of ordinary Human conduct. Which of the above statements are correct?
Civils With Akash
Consider the following statements in light of the supreme court's recent ruling on child trafficking and relevant constitutional principles:
1. A trafficked child cannot be treated as an accomplice, as this would violate the expanded interpretation of Article 21.
2. Convention in trafficking cases may rest solely on the credible testimony of the victim, consistent with established Criminal Jurisprudence.
3. Article 39(E) and (F) are irrelevant for courts while evolving standards of Evidence, as they are Non- Justiciable.
4. Expectation of immediate resistance by a trafficked child conforms to the test of ordinary Human conduct.
Which of the above statements are correct?
1 day ago | [YT] | 2