Liz Gale

Oh I see Alan is responding to my last video, but he has me blocked so I can’t respond haha that about sums up his character imo.

I’m gonna say it here then:

Hey ‪@AlanzosBlog‬ you’ve spent HOURS AND HOURS telling us born into Scientology ex members how to feell, think and behave. You have hundreds of statements where you say “this is what you HAVE to do…” and “these people NEED to do xyz” and “the right way think think about this is…”

You’ve literally mansplained my own life experience (which I lived and you did not), to me. It’s both hilarious and appalling.

Did you even listen to what ‪@drstevenhassan‬ said? Did you hear it at all? Or you just didn’t like that I was saying it?

You were not born into Scientology. Why are you so interested in being the gatekeeper and the one defining that experience and policing how people talk about their own lived experiences and lives?

Again, lives THEY lived and you DID NOT, HAVE NOT and WILL NOT.

Not to mention, most of the people you condescend to are women. Coincidence? Doubtful. Men who pick on women are usually over compensating for something lol (every woman reading this knows exactly what i mean).

Why do you think you know how it feels and you somehow know better than the people who were there?

I’ve held my tongue, Alan. While you insult and mock and degrade and belittle survivors because (it appears) you’re desperate to be relevant, the rest of us are living our lives with our families and friends and pets and communities. Yet you mock and belittle us for sharing our experiences and trying to advocate for children being treated better.

I don’t get it. What’s your game? What’s your deal? I don’t think it’s for money, because you said you’re broke and live in a garage and don’t have family.

Is it all for attention, Alan? Does it make you feel big to tell people who were locked in rooms that it didn’t happen? That they actually wanted those terminations of pregnancy they begged not to have? Do you get off saying that YOU SQUIRRELED TECH in the course room to protect children so all Scientology isn’t bad?
How many times did you do the purif as a kid? How many times did you receive the CHILDRENS SECURITY CHECK? How many months did you go at a time without seeing your family, raised by an institution?

Better yet, how many children have you raised or been guardian to?

Have you ever even babysat a kid, Alan? And if you say yes, then provide receipts because i want to fact check that any parent would hand over their kid to you.

For the record, if you are advocating for these things, you are preaching abuse and need to be reported as such. And, unlike Scientologists, I take my mandatory reporting duties seriously as an oath i took at 17 when I first started college getting my degree in Child and Family Studies with a specialization in Early Childhood Education… an oath I upheld working 10 years as a lead teacher at a pre-5th auditory verbal school for children with hearing loss, and as a licensed educator with annual ongoing continuing ed, and in my current position as community support.


Reasons Scientology is dangerous for kids:
*childrens security check
*no age appropriate content restrictions in bullbaiting, auditing or ethics
*parents not told about abuse reported in session
*billion year contracts
*forced confessionals as a solution to age appropriate behavior struggles
*false diagnosis in study tech
*cannot receive mental health help
*self blame for accidents, illness and injury
*no private thoughts/no right to self
*forced past life regression
*scientology counselors are mandatory reporters but are NOT reporting abuse to authorities
*making pedos do amends by working with kids
*monetizing trauma by charging for absolving both victims and children
*not reporting SA to authorities but making victims do ethics behavior modification instead
*emotional control- survival and non survival emotions
*considering feelings to be HE&R
*hypnotism in auditing is hidden and no one gives consent
*pain and sex policy letter (children being made to read)
*objectives make a person controllable without their knowledge or consent
*barley formula is scientifically proven to cause malnutrition in babies but is still promoted
*family is an implant and therefore temporary and subject to control rules
*developmetal delays, birth defects and childhood illnesses are seen as the fault of the child and solution is to subject to intense shame based processing

I could literally go on and on…..

I’ll be here waiting for a response (haha not), but I doubt I’ll get one. Not to my face anyway.

I suspect that’d take more courage than Alan has, but maybe he’ll prove me wrong.

I’m not afraid to be wrong. I’m more afraid of children being hurt and not doing anything about it. Worse yet, saying nothing while a so called anti-Scientology activist turns coat and starts preaching how Scientology is actually not the problem, the kids born into it are.

2 months ago (edited) | [YT] | 299